Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanjay & Ors vs State & Anr
2011 Latest Caselaw 6243 Del

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 6243 Del
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2011

Delhi High Court
Sanjay & Ors vs State & Anr on 19 December, 2011
Author: Suresh Kait
$~12
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+     CRL.M.C. 3928/2011

%            Judgment delivered on: 19th December, 2011

      SANJAY & ORS                          ..... Petitioner
                              Through : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv.

                     versus

      STATE & ANR                         ..... Respondent
                              Through : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP.
                              Mr. T.R. Saini, Adv. for R2.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT


SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

1 Learned counsel for petitioners submits that vide FIR No. 132 dated 24.4.2001, a case under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC was registered at P.S. Sadar Bazar against the petitioners on the complaint of respondent No. 2.

2 Learned counsel further submits that, it was agreed that petitioner shall pay Rs.1,50,000/- to respondent No. 2 and custody of minor child namely Praduman always remain in the care and custody of her mother Smt. Shashi / R-2.

3 Both the parties, including petitioners No.1 to 7 and respondent No.2 are present in the court today. Respondent No. 2 is duly identified by her counsel, Mr. T.R. Saini, Advocate. Petitioners No. 1 to 7 are

identified by Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate.

4 Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have resolved their issues amicably and they do not want to pursue the case further.

5 Further submits that as per the settlement, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No.2 have jointly purchased a new home and will reside in that house as husband and wife.

6 Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that she does not want to pursue the case in view of the settlement and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed.

7 Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the statement made by respondent No.2, I quash the FIR No. 132/2001 registered at P.S. Sadar Bazar, Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.

8 Criminal M.C. 3928/2011 is allowed in the above terms. 9 Since Crl.M.C.3928/2011 is allowed Crl.M.A. 18510/2011 (Stay) become infructuous and disposed of as such.

10    Dasti.



                                            SURESH KAIT, J

DECEMBER 19, 2011
j





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter