Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 4179 Del
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WP(C) No.2337/2010
% Date of Decision: 26.08.2011
Dr.Punita K.Sodhi .... Petitioner
Through Petitioner in person
Versus
Union of India & Ors. .... Respondents
Through Mr.Saquib, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
1. Whether reporters of Local papers NO
may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be NO
reported in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
1. The petitioner, Dr.Punita K.Sodhi, who appears in person
states that by order dated 5th July, 2011 she has been promoted to
the post of Associate Professor w.e.f. 1st March, 2009, and
consequently, reliefs sought by her except relief sought against
extension of probation have been received by her.
2. The petitioner on consideration of her pleas and contentions
also states that she does not want to press her relief against the
extension of her probation by 78 days at the post of teaching
specialist at this stage with liberty to raise it at appropriate stage in
accordance with law, if so required.
Consequently, writ petition is disposed of with liberty as
prayed for. Parties are, however, left to bear their own costs.
All the pending applications are also disposed of.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
VEENA BIRBAL, J.
August 26, 2011.
vk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!