Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 4961 Del
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2010
UNREPORTABLE
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P. (C) No.6745/2010
Date of Decision: October 27, 2010
M/S. INTERACTIVE COMPOSITION CORPN.... Petitioner
through Ms. Prerna Mehta, Advocate
versus
WORKMEN SHRAVNI CHATTERJEE & ANR ...... Respondent
through none
CORAM:
HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE REKHA SHARMA
1. Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
judgment? No
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the 'Digest'? No
REKHA SHARMA, J. (ORAL)
Despite service of notice upon respondent no. 1, none has
appeared for the said respondent.
The petitioner has impugned the order of the Presiding Officer,
Labour Court dated July 26, 2010 whereby its application seeking
permission to cross-examine two witnesses, namely, Dev Raj who was
examined as WW-1 and Ms. Radha Devraj who was examined as
WW-32 was disallowed. The learned Labour Court has dismissed the
application on the ground that the petitioner who wanted to
cross-examine these witnesses in order to prove that the workman was
gainfully employed had not disclosed in the application the source of
its information regarding the gainful employment of the workman.
WP(C) No.6745 of 2010 Page 1 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I find that the
reason assigned by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court in not allowing
the application is wholly misconceived. It was not necessary for the
petitioner to reveal the source of its information as to the gainful
employment of the workman. It appears that the petitioner wanted to
elicit this information from the witnesses through the medium of
cross-examination. The request was reasonable and ought not to have
been declined. Hence, I set aside the order dated July 26, 2010. The
Presiding Officer, Labour Court is directed to grant an opportunity to
the petitioner to cross-examine WW-1 - Dev Raj and WW-32 - Ms.
Radha Devraj.
The parties shall appear before the Labour Court on
December 20, 2010 and on the said date, the Labour Court shall give a
date to the petitioner for cross-examination of the aforesaid witnesses.
Thereafter, it shall proceed further with the case.
The writ petition is disposed of.
REKHA SHARMA, J.
OCTOBER 27, 2010 PC.
WP(C) No.6745 of 2010 Page 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!