Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 5217 Del
Judgement Date : 16 November, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Reserve: November 01, 2010
Date of Order: 16th November, 2010
+ Crl.M.C.No. 3127/2009
% 16.11.2010
Chaitanya Bhardwaj @ Chaitanya ... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Saifi Ahmad, Advocate
Versus
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. ... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State
with Inspector Suresh Kumar
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not?
3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?
JUDGMENT
This petition has been preferred against the order dated 1st
September, 2009 of learned MM whereby the learned MM permitted the Investigating
Officer to go ahead with Narco Analysis and Brain Mapping Test of the accused
despite opposition by the accused. Although the learned MM had directed for
observing certain safeguards, however, in view of judgment of Supreme Court in
Smt. Selvi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka JT2010(5)SC11, this petition has to be
allowed as Supreme Court has observed that this test can be conducted only with the
consent of the accused. As there is no consent given in the present case, the order
of the trial Court, in view of latest legal position, cannot stand. The petition is
allowed. The order dated 1st September, 2009 of learned MM is set aside.
November 16, 2010 SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J. vn
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!