Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nisha Sharma & Ors. vs Deo Nath Mishra & Ors.
2010 Latest Caselaw 1664 Del

Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 1664 Del
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2010

Delhi High Court
Nisha Sharma & Ors. vs Deo Nath Mishra & Ors. on 25 March, 2010
Author: J.R. Midha
26
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                  +       MAC.APP.No.627/2006

                               Date of Decision: 25th March, 2010
%

      NISHA SHARMA & ORS.         ..... Appellants
                   Through : Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv.

                      versus

      DEO NATH MISHRA & ORS.       ..... Respondents
                   Through : Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv.

CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.      Whether Reporters of Local papers may               YES
        be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.      To be referred to the Reporter or not?              YES

3.      Whether the judgment should be                      YES
        reported in the Digest?

                          JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The appellants have challenged the award of the

learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.12,97,000/-

has been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek

enhancement of the award amount.

2. The accident dated 11th February, 2005 resulted in the

death of Shyam Rattan. The deceased was survived by his

widow, three sons and mother who filed the claim petition

before the learned Tribunal.

3. The deceased was aged 39 years and 7 months at the

time of the accident and was working as a Constable in Delhi

Police drawing a salary of Rs.10,904/- per month. The

learned Tribunal deducted Rs.4,360/- towards GPF, CGEGIS,

DPWS and Education Fund, added 50% towards future

prospects, deducted 1/3rd towards personal expenses of the

deceased and applied the multiplier of 16 to compute the

loss of dependency at Rs.12,56,544/-. Rs.15,000/- has been

awarded towards loss of consortium, Rs.15,000/- towards

loss of love and affection and Rs.10,000/- towards funeral

expenses. The total compensation awarded is

Rs.12,97,000/-.

4. The learned counsel for the appellants have urged the

following grounds at the time of hearing of this appeal:-

(i) The deduction of Rs.4,360/- towards GPF, CGEGIS,

DPWS and Education Fund be set aside.

(ii) The personal expenses of the deceased be

reduced from 1/3rd to 1/4th.

(iii) The compensation be awarded for loss of estate.

5. The learned counsel for respondent No.3 in reply

submits that the appropriate multiplier at the age of 39 years

and 7 months is 15 according to the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi

Transport Corporation, 2009 (6) Scale 129 and,

therefore, the multiplier be reduced.

6. The Claims Tribunal has deducted Rs.4,360/- towards

GPF, CGEGIS, DPWS and Education Fund. The income of the

deceased as per the salary slip - Ex.PW1/A is Rs.10,904/- as

per break-up given hereunder:-

              Dues                    Deductions              Recoveries
Basic Pay    4400     GPF Contri.      4000       D.P.W.S.      150
Dearness     2200     C.G.E.G.I.S.      30          Edn.        180
Pay                                                Fund

Pay




Allow.

Allow.

H.R.A.

Allow.

Money

Allow.

                                                    Net          6544
                                                  Payable



7. Out of the said amount, only transport allowance of

Rs.100/-, washing allowance of Rs.20/-, Metro. P. allowance

of Rs.60/-, CGEGIS of Rs.30/-, DPWS of Rs.150/- and

conveyance allowance of Rs.30/- are deductable. The Claims

Tribunal erred in deducting the GPF and Education Fund

which forms part of the salary of the deceased. After making

the aforesaid deductions, the income of the deceased for

computation of compensation is computed to be Rs.10,514/-.

8. The deceased was aged 39 years and 7 months at the

time of the accident and was survived by five legal

representatives. According to the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of Sarla Verma (supra), 50% has

to be added towards future prospects, 1/4th has to be

deducted towards personal expenses and the multiplier of 15

is applicable. Following the aforesaid judgment, the personal

expenses of the deceased are reduced from 1/3rd to 1/4th and

the multiplier is reduced from 16 to 15. Taking the income of

the deceased as Rs.10,514/- per month, adding 50% towards

future prospects, deducting 1/4th towards personal expenses

and applying the multiplier of 15, the loss of dependency is

computed to be Rs.21,29,085/- [(Rs.10,514 + 50% of

Rs.10,514) x 3/4 x 12 x 15].

9. The Claims Tribunal has not awarded any compensation

for loss of estate. Rs.10,000/- is awarded towards loss of

estate. The claimants are entitled to total compensation of

Rs.21,79,085/- (Rs.21,29,085 + Rs.15,000 + Rs.15,000 +

Rs.10,000 + Rs.10,000).

10. The learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that

appellant No.1 has got job in Delhi Police on compassionate

ground and, therefore, the award amount is liable to be

reduced. Appellant No.1 is getting the salary for rendering

services to Delhi Police and is not getting any amount free of

cost sitting at home and, therefore, no deduction is

permissible on this ground.

11. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is

enhanced from Rs.12,97,000/- to Rs.21,79,085/-. The

learned Tribunal has awarded interest @ 8% per annum

which is not disturbed on the original award amount of

Rs.12,97,000/-. However, on the enhanced award amount,

the rate of interest shall be @7.5% per annum from the date

of filing of the petition up to the date of notice of deposit

under Order XXI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

12. The enhanced award amount along with interest be

deposited by respondent No.3 with UCO Bank A/c Nisha

Sharma, Delhi High Court Branch through Mr. M.M. Tandon,

Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street,

New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) within 30 days.

13. Upon the aforesaid deposit being made, UCO Bank is

directed to release 10% of the same equally to appellants

No.1 and 2 by transferring the same to their respective

Saving Bank Account. The remaining amount be kept in fixed

deposit in the following manner:-

(i) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellants No.1 for a

period of one year.

(ii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellants No.2 for a

period of two years.

(iii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellants No.3 for a

period of three years.

(iv) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellants No.4 for a

period of four years.

(v) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellants No.5 for a

period of five years.

(vi) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellants No.1 for a

period of six years.

(vii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellants No.3 for a

period of seven years.

(viii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellants No.4 for a

period of eight years.

(ix) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellants No.5 for a

period of nine years.

14. The interest on the aforesaid fixed deposits shall be

paid monthly by automatic credit of interest in the Savings

Account of the appellants No.1 to 5.

15. Withdrawal from the aforesaid account shall be

permitted to appellants No.1 to 5 after due verification and

the Bank shall issue photo Identity Card to appellants No.1

to 5 to facilitate identity.

16. No cheque book be issued to appellants No.1 to 5

without the permission of this Court.

17. The Bank shall issue Fixed Deposit Pass Book instead of

the FDRs to appellants No.1 to 5 and the maturity amount of

the FDRs be automatically credited to the Saving Bank

Account of the beneficiary at the end of the FDR.

18. No loan, advance or withdrawal shall be allowed on the

said fixed deposit receipts without the permission of this

Court.

19. Half yearly statement of account be filed by the Bank in

this Court.

20. On the request of appellants No.1 to 5, the Bank shall

transfer the Savings Account to any other branch of UCO

Bank according to the convenience of appellants No.1 to 5.

21. The appellants shall furnish all the relevant documents

for opening of the Saving Bank Account and Fixed Deposit

Account to Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank

Zonal, Parliament Street, New Delhi (Mobile No.

09310356400).

22. List for reporting compliance on 10th May, 2010.

23. Copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for both the

parties under signatures of the Court Master.

24. Copy of this order be also sent to Mr. M.M. Tandon,

Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street,

New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) through the UCO Bank,

High Court Branch under the signature of Court Master.

J.R. MIDHA, J MARCH 25, 2010 aj

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter