Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Surendri & Ors vs Satpal & Anr
2010 Latest Caselaw 1514 Del

Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 1514 Del
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2010

Delhi High Court
Surendri & Ors vs Satpal & Anr on 18 March, 2010
Author: J.R. Midha
22

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                      +   MAC.APP.No.537/2007


                                  Date of Decision: 18th March, 2010
%

      SURENDRI & ORS               ..... Appellants
                   Through Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv.

                      versus

      SATPAL & ANR                      ..... Respondents
                           Through Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Adv. for
                           R-2.


CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.      Whether Reporters of Local papers may                  YES
        be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.      To be referred to the Reporter or not?                 YES

3.      Whether the judgment should be                         YES
        reported in the Digest?


                          JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The appellants have challenged the award of the

learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.1,77,000/- has

been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek

enhancement of the award amount.

2. The accident dated 11th December, 2005 resulted in the

death of Jagat Singh. The deceased was survived by his

widow, six minor daughters, one minor son and parents who

filed the claim petition before the learned Tribunal.

3. The deceased was aged about 32 years at the time of

the accident and was working in the dairy farm. In the

absence of any documentary proof of the income of the

deceased, the learned Tribunal took the notional income of

the deceased as Rs.15,000/- per annum, deducted 1/3rd

towards his personal expenses and applied the multiplier of

17 to compute the loss of dependency at Rs.1,70,000/-. The

learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.2,000/- towards funeral

expenses and Rs.5,000/- towards loss of consortium. The

learned Tribunal has awarded total compensation of

Rs.1,77,000/- to the appellants.

4. The learned counsel for the appellants has urged the

following grounds at the time of hearing of this appeal:-

(i) The income of the deceased be taken to be

according to the minimum wages of Rs.3,166/- per

month.

(ii) The personal expenses of the deceased be not

deducted in view of the large family.

(iii) The compensation be awarded for loss of love and

affection and loss of estate.

5. The deceased was working in a dairy farm. It is well

settled that in the absence of any documentary proof,

the Claims Tribunal should have taken the minimum

wages into consideration. The Claims Tribunal has erred

in taking the notional income of Rs.15,000/- per

month. The minimum wages of Rs.3,166/- are taken for

computation of compensation. The deceased has left behind

ten legal representatives. Considering the large family of the

deceased, no deduction in respect of his personal expenses

for computation of compensation is done. The deceased was

aged 32 years at the time of accident and the Claims

Tribunal has applied the multiplier of 17. According to the

judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sarla

Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, 2009 (6) Scale

129, the appropriate multiplier at the age of 32 years is 16

and, therefore, the multiplier is reduced from 17 to 16.

6. The Claims Tribunal has not awarded any compensation

for loss of love and affection and loss of estate. Rs.10,000/-

is awarded towards loss of love and affection and Rs.10,000/-

towards loss of estate.

7. Taking the income of the deceased to be Rs.3,166/- per

month, applying the multiplier of 16, adding Rs.5,000/-

towards the loss of consortium, Rs.2,000/- towards funeral

expenses, Rs.10,000/- loss of love and affection and

Rs.10,000/- towards loss of estate, the total compensation

computed to be Rs.6,34,872/- [(3166 x 12 x 16) + 5,000/- +

2,000/- + 10,000 + 10,000/-].

8. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is

enhanced from Rs.1,77,000/- to Rs.6,34,872/- along with

interest @7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the

petition till notice under Order 21 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil

Procedure. The enhanced award amount along with interest

be deposited by the respondent No.2 with UCO Bank A/c

Surendri, Delhi High Court Branch, within 30 days.

9. Upon the aforesaid amount being deposited the UCO

Bank is directed to release 10% of the same to appellant

No.1 by transferring the same to her Savings Bank Account.

The remaining amount be kept in the fixed deposits in the

following manner:-

(i) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellant No.1 for the

period of six months.

(ii) Fixed deposit in respect of 5% of the award

amount in the name of appellant No.9 for the

period of one year.

(iii) Fixed deposit in respect of 5% of the award

amount in the name of appellant No.10 for the

period of one year.

(iv) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellant No.2 for the

period of one and a half years.

(v) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellant No.3 for the

period of two years.

(vi) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellant No.4 till he

attains the age of 18 years.

(vii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellant No.5 till she

attains the age of 18 years.

(viii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellant No.6 till she

attains the age of 18 years.

(ix) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellant No.7 till she

attains the age of 18 years.

(x) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount in the name of appellant No.8 till she

attains the age of 18 years.

10. The interest on the aforesaid fixed deposits shall be

paid monthly by automatic credit of interest in the Savings

Account of appellant No.1.

11. Withdrawal from the aforesaid account shall be

permitted to appellant No.1 after due verification and the

Bank shall issue photo Identity Card to appellant No.1 to

facilitate identity.

12. No cheque book be issued to appellant No.1 without the

permission of this Court.

13. The Bank shall issue Fixed Deposit Pass Book instead of

the FDRs to the appellants and the maturity amount of the

FDRs be automatically credited to the Saving Bank Account

of the beneficiary at the end of the FDR.

14. No loan, advance or withdrawal shall be allowed on the

said fixed deposit receipts without the permission of this

Court.

15. Half yearly statement of account be filed by the Bank in

this Court.

16. On the request of appellant No.1, the Bank shall

transfer the Savings Account to any other branch according

to the convenience of appellant No.1.

17. The appellant Nos.1 to 10 shall furnish all the relevant

documents for opening of the Saving Bank Account and Fixed

Deposit Account to Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-Retail Team,

UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street, New Delhi.

18. Copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for both the

parties under the signatures of the Court Master.

19. Copy of this order be also sent to Mr. M.M. Tandon,

Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street,

New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) through the UCO Bank,

High Court Branch under the signature of Court Master.

J.R. MIDHA, J MARCH 18, 2010/HL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter