Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 1474 Del
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision: 16.03.2010
+ WP (C) No.7754 of 2007
SHRI AJEET PRASAD AGGARWAL ...PETITIONER
Through: Mr. Anand Yadav, Advocate.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate
for the LAC.
Mr. Rajiv Bansal & Mr. Harshit
Agarwal, Advocates for the DDA.
Ms. Sudershani Ray, Advocate
for the MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers
may be allowed to see the judgment? No
2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be No
reported in the Digest?
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. (Oral)
For Orders, see WP(C) Nos.12974-75/2006.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
MARCH 16, 2010 VEENA BIRBAL, J. b'nesh
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!