Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shiddhi Gopal Dixit @ Siddh Gopal ... vs Siya Ram & Ors
2010 Latest Caselaw 1177 Del

Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 1177 Del
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2010

Delhi High Court
Shiddhi Gopal Dixit @ Siddh Gopal ... vs Siya Ram & Ors on 3 March, 2010
Author: J.R. Midha
10
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                  +       MAC.APP.No.573/2009

                                  Date of Decision: 3rd March, 2010
%

      SHIDDHI GOPAL DIXIT @ SIDDH
      GOPAL DIXIT                        ..... Appellant
                    Through : Mr. K.K. Dubey, Adv.

                      versus

      SIYA RAM & ORS                       ..... Respondents
                           Through : Mr. Mohan Babu Aggarwal,
                                     Adv.

CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.      Whether Reporters of Local papers may                 YES
        be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.      To be referred to the Reporter or not?                YES

3.      Whether the judgment should be                        YES
        reported in the Digest?

                          JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The appellant has challenged the award of the learned

Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.3,33,701/- has been

awarded to him. The appellant seeks enhancement of the

award amount.

2. The accident dated 7th December, 2006 resulted in

grievous injuries to the appellant. The appellant was

crossing the road when his right hand got crushed between

the offending truck and a stationary truck parked therein.

The appellant‟s right hand was amputated and his

permanent disability was assessed as 85% as per the

disability certificate. The appellant was working as a fruit

vendor. The learned Tribunal awarded Rs.25,000/- towards

pain and suffering, Rs.41,341/- towards medical expenditure,

Rs.15,000/- towards conveyance and special diet and

Rs.2,52,360/- towards loss of earning capacity. The total

compensation awarded is Rs.3,33,701/-.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant has urged the

following grounds at the time of hearing of this appeal:-

(i) The compensation be awarded for loss of income

during the period of confinement/treatment of

about one year.

(ii) The compensation for loss of earning capacity be

awarded.

(iii) The compensation for pain and suffering be

enhanced.

(iv) The compensation be awarded for loss of

amenities of life and disfiguration.

4. The learned Tribunal has computed the loss of earning

capacity at Rs.2,52,360/- taking the minimum wages of

Rs.3,505/- per month, applying the multiplier of 15 and

taking the loss of earning capacity to be 40%. The increase

in minimum wages due to inflation and rise in price index has

not been taken into consideration.

5. It is well settled by catena of judgments of this Court in

the cases of Kanwar Devi vs. Bansal Roadways, 2008

ACJ 2182, National Insurance Company Limited vs.

Renu Devi III (2008) ACC 134 and UPSRTC vs. Munni

Devi, MAC.APP.No.310/2007 decided on 28.07.2008 that

the Court should take judicial notice of increase in minimum

wages to meet the increase in price index and inflation rate.

The Court has taken the view that the minimum wages get

doubled over the period of 10 years and increase in

minimum wages is not akin to future prospects. Following

the aforesaid judgments, the income of the appellant is

taken to be Rs.5,257.50 per month [(Rs.3,505 + Rs.7,010)/2].

6. The learned Tribunal has taken the loss of earning

capacity of the appellant to be 40%. The appellant has

suffered permanent disability of 85% in respect of the right

arm. The appellant is present in the Court and considering

his injuries, the loss of earning capacity is taken to be 50%.

Taking the income of the appellant to be Rs.5,257.50 per

month, applying the multiplier of 15 and taking the loss of

earning capacity to be 50%, the loss of earning capacity is

taken to be Rs.4,73,175/- [(Rs.5,257.50 x 12 x 15) x 50%].

7. The learned Tribunal has not awarded any

compensation for loss of income during the period of

treatment. The appellant has not placed on record the

documents relating to the treatment and confinement for

one year. In the facts and circumstances of this case, the

period of treatment and confinement is taken to be six

months and the loss of income for six months is assessed as

Rs.31,545/- (Rs.5,257.50 x 6).

8. The learned Tribunal has awarded compensation of

Rs.25,000/- towards pain and suffering. In the case of

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Vijay Kumar Mittal

(2008) ACJ 1300, this Court examined all the previous

judgments with respect to the non-pecuniary compensation

awarded in the cases of permanent disability and held that

the Courts have been awarding about Rs.3,00,000/- under

the heads of non-pecuniary damages for amputation of leg

with permanent disability of 50% and above. The findings of

this Court are reproduced hereinunder:-

"17. From the aforenoted judicial decisions, a trend which emerges is that between the years 1985 and 1990, the courts have been awarding about Rs.3,00,000/- under the head „non- pecuniary damages‟ for amputation of leg resulting in permanent disability of 50 per cent and above."

9. Following the aforesaid judgment, the compensation for

pain and suffering is enhanced from Rs.25,000/- to

Rs.1,00,000/-. Rs.1,00,000/- is awarded towards loss of

amenities of life and Rs.1,00,000/- towards disfiguration.

10. The appellant is entitled to total compensation of

Rs.8,61,061/- (Rs.41,341/- towards medical expenditure,

Rs.15,000/- towards conveyance and special diet,

Rs.31,545/- towards loss of income, Rs.4,73,175/- towards

loss of earning capacity, Rs.1,00,000/- towards pain and

suffering, Rs.1,00,000/- towards loss of amenities of life and

Rs.1,00,000/- towards disfiguration).

11. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is

enhanced from Rs.3,33,701/- to Rs.8,61,061/- along with

interest @8% per annum from the date of filing of the

petition till the date of notice of deposit under Order 21

Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

12. The enhanced award amount along with interest be

deposited by respondent No.3 with UCO Bank A/c Siddhi

Gopal Dixit, Patiala House Branch through Mr. M.M.

Tandon, Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal,

Parliament Street, New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400)

within 30 days.

13. Upon the aforesaid deposit being made, UCO Bank is

directed to release 10% of the same to the claimant. The

remaining amount be kept in fixed deposit in the name of the

appellant in the following manner:-

(i) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount for a period of one year.

(ii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount for a period of one and a half years.

(iii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount for a period of two years.

(iv) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount for a period of two and a half years.

(v) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount for a period of three years.

(vi) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount for a period of three and a half years.

(vii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount for a period of four years.

(viii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount for a period of four and a half years.

(ix) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award

amount for a period of five years.

14. The interest on the aforesaid fixed deposits shall be

paid monthly by automatic credit of interest in the Savings

Account of the appellant.

15. Withdrawal from the aforesaid account shall be

permitted to the appellant after due verification and the

Bank shall issue photo Identity Card to the appellant to

facilitate identity.

16. No cheque book be issued to the appellant without the

permission of this Court.

17. The Bank shall issue Fixed Deposit Pass Book instead of

the FDRs to the appellant and the maturity amount of the

FDRs be automatically credited to the Saving Bank Account

of the beneficiary at the end of the FDR.

18. No loan, advance or withdrawal shall be allowed on the

said fixed deposit receipts without the permission of this

Court.

19. Half yearly statement of account be filed by the Bank in

this Court.

20. On the request of the appellant, the Bank shall transfer

the Savings Account to any other branch of UCO Bank

according to the convenience of the appellant.

21. The appellant shall furnish all the relevant documents

for opening of the Saving Bank Account and Fixed Deposit

Account to Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank

Zonal, Parliament Street, New Delhi (Mobile No.

09310356400).

22. Copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for both the

parties under signatures of the Court Master.

23. Copy of this order be also sent to Mr. M.M. Tandon,

Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street,

New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) through the UCO Bank,

High Court Branch under the signature of Court Master.

J.R. MIDHA, J

MARCH 03, 2010 aj

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter