Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Balwant Singh vs Sohan Singh & Ors.
2010 Latest Caselaw 466 Del

Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 466 Del
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2010

Delhi High Court
Balwant Singh vs Sohan Singh & Ors. on 28 January, 2010
Author: J.R. Midha
13
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                       +       MAC.APP.No.577/2008

%                                 Date of decision: 28th January, 2010


      BALWANT SINGH                      ..... Appellant
                   Through : Mr. V.P. Katiyar, Adv.

                      versus

      SOHAN SINGH & ORS.                ..... Respondents
                   Through : Mr. Sudhir Makkar and
                             Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Advs.
                             for R-2.
                             Mr. Mohan Babu Aggarwal
                             and Mr. Harkesh Chand
                             Aggarwal, Advs. for R-3.

CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.      Whether Reporters of Local papers may                  YES
        be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.      To be referred to the Reporter or not?                 YES

3.      Whether the judgment should be                         YES
        reported in the Digest?

                               JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The appellant has challenged the award of the learned

Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.45,727/- has been awarded

to him. The appellant seeks enhancement of the award amount.

2. The accident dated 7th May, 2003 resulted in grievous

injuries to the appellant. The appellant was driving his TSR

No.DL-1RD-7971 while going from Safdarjung Hospital to

Nizamuddin along with passengers when he was hit by a Honda

City car bearing No.DL-6CG-8432. The appellant suffered

fracture of shaft femur left side (middle 1/3rd) and was admitted

at Khetrapal Hospital, Bali Nagar from 10 th May, 2003 to 16th May,

2003 where an operation was performed on 15th May, 2003 and a

rod was inserted in the left shaft. The disability of the appellant

has been assessed to be 80% in respect of left lower limb. As per

disability certificate, it is a case of "Non union femur(L) ć implant

in setu."

3. The learned Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.25,000/-

towards pain and suffering, Rs.10,000/- towards special diet,

Rs.7,000/- towards conveyance, Rs.3,727/- towards treatment.

The total compensation awarded is Rs.45,727/-.

4. The learned counsel for the appellant has urged the

following grounds at the time of hearing of this appeal:-

(i) Compensation for loss of income due to permanent

disability be awarded.

(ii) Compensation for pain and suffering be enhanced.

(iii) Compensation for loss of amenities of life and

disfiguration be awarded.

(iv) Compensation for conveyance and special diet be

enhanced.

5. The appellant was aged 33 years at the time of the accident

and was doing the job of auto driver earning Rs.5,000/- per

month. However, in the absence of any documentary proof, the

minimum wages of Rs.3,207.90 per month are taken into

consideration. It is well settled by catena of judgments of this

Court in the cases of Kanwar Devi vs. Bansal Roadways,

2008 ACJ 2182, National Insurance Company Limited vs.

Renu Devi III (2008) ACC 134 and UPSRTC vs. Munni Devi,

MAC.APP.No.310/2007 decided on 28.07.2008 that the Court

should take judicial notice of increase in minimum wages to meet

the increase in price index and inflation rate. The Court has taken

the view that the minimum wages get doubled over the period of

10 years and increase in minimum wages is not akin to future

prospects. Following the aforesaid judgments, the income of the

appellant is taken to be Rs.4,811.85 per month [(Rs.3,207.90 +

Rs.6,415.80)/2]. The appellant has suffered 80% disability in

respect of left lower limb. However, the functional disability and

loss of earning capacity is taken to be 30%. Taking the income of

the deceased to be Rs.4,811.85 per month, applying the

multiplier of 16 and taking 30% thereof, the loss of income is

computed to be Rs.2,77,162/- (Rs.4,811.85 x 12 x 16) x 30%].

6. The learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.25,000/- towards

compensation for pain and suffering which is on a lower side.

The learned counsel refers to and relies upon the judgment of the

Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of Oriental Insurance Co.

Ltd. vs. Vijay Kumar Mittal (2008) ACJ 1300, where this

Court examined all the previous judgments with respect to the

non-pecuniary compensation awarded in the cases of permanent

disability and held that the Courts have been awarding about

Rs.3,00,000/- under the heads of non-pecuniary damages for

amputation of leg with permanent disability of 50% and above.

The findings of this Court are reproduced hereinunder:-

"17. From the aforenoted judicial decisions, a trend which emerges is that

between the years 1985 and 1990, the courts have been awarding about Rs.3,00,000/- under the head „non-pecuniary damages‟ for amputation of leg resulting in permanent disability of 50 per cent and above."

7. Following the aforesaid judgment, the compensation for

pain and suffering is enhanced from Rs.25,000/- to Rs.75,000/-.

Rs.75,000/- is awarded towards loss of amenities of life and

Rs.50,000/- is awarded towards disfiguration.

8. The learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.7,000/- towards

conveyance which is on a lower side considering that the

appellant has suffered 80% disability in respect of left lower limb

and cannot use the public transport and, therefore, would be

incurring the expenditure on conveyance. The compensation

towards conveyance is, therefore, enhanced from Rs.7,000/- to

Rs.20,000/-.

9. The appellant is entitled to total compensation of

Rs.5,10,889/- (Rs.2,77,162 + Rs.75,000 + Rs.75,000 + Rs.50,000

+ Rs.20,000 + Rs.10,000 + Rs.3,727).

10. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is enhanced

from Rs.45,727/- to Rs.5,10,889/-. The learned Tribunal has

awarded interest @ 9% per annum which is not disturbed on the

original award amount of Rs.45,727/-. However, on the enhanced

award amount, the rate of interest shall be @ 7.5% per annum

from the date of filing of the petition till realization.

11. Respondent No.3 is directed to deposit the enhanced award

amount along with up to date interest with UCO Bank A/c Balwant

Singh, Delhi High Court Branch through Mr. M.M. Tandon,

Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street, New

Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) within 30 days.

12. Upon the aforesaid deposit being made, the UCO Bank is

directed to release 10% of the same to the appellant by

transferring the same to his Saving Bank Account.

13. The remaining amount be kept in fixed deposit in the name

of the appellant in the following manner:-

(i) Fixed deposit of 10% of the amount for a period of six

months.

(ii) Fixed deposit of 10% of the amount for a period of one

year.

(iii) Fixed deposit of 10% of the amount for a period of one

and a half years.

(iv) Fixed deposit of 10% of the amount for a period of two

years.

(v) Fixed deposit of 10% of the amount for a period of two

and a half years.

(vi) Fixed deposit of 10% of the amount for a period of

three years.

(vii) Fixed deposit of 10% of the amount for a period of

three and a half years.

(viii) Fixed deposit of 10% of the amount for a period of four

years.

(ix) Fixed deposit of 10% of the amount for a period of four

and a half years.

14. The interest on the aforesaid fixed deposits shall be paid

monthly by automatic credit of interest in the Savings Account of

the appellant.

15. Withdrawal from the aforesaid account shall be permitted to

the appellant after due verification and the Bank shall issue photo

Identity Card to the appellant to facilitate identity.

16. No cheque book be issued to the appellant without the

permission of this Court.

17. The original Fixed Deposit Receipts shall be retained by the

Bank in the safe custody. However, the original Pass Book shall

be given to the appellant along with the photocopy of the FDRs.

18. The original Fixed Deposit Receipts shall be handed over to

the appellant on the expiry of the period of the FDRs.

19. No loan, advance or withdrawal shall be allowed on the said

fixed deposit receipts without the permission of this Court.

20. Half yearly statement of account be filed by the Bank in this

Court.

21. On the request of the appellant, the Bank shall transfer the

Savings Account to any other branch of UCO Bank according to

the convenience of the appellant.

22. The appellant shall furnish all the relevant documents for

opening of the Saving Bank Account and Fixed Deposit Account

to Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal,

Parliament Street, New Delhi.

23. List for reporting compliance on 8th April, 2010.

24. Copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for both the

parties under the signatures of the Court Master.

25. Copy of this order be also sent to Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-

Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street, New Delhi

(Mobile No. 09310356400) through the UCO Bank, High Court

Branch under the signature of Court Master.

J.R. MIDHA, J

JANUARY 28, 2010 aj

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter