Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 316 Del
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Reserve: December 08, 2009
Date of Order: January 20, 2010
+ OMP 584 of 2008
% 20.01.2010
Dalbir Kaur ...Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vineet Chadha, Advocate
Versus
Inderjeet Singh & Ors. ...Respondents
Through: Mr. Joginder Singh, Advocate
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not?
3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?
JUDGMENT
1. By this order, I shall dispose of a petition under Section 24 read with Section
151 CPC preferred by the petitioner for transfer and consolidation of two suits
pending before the District Court to this Court. It is submitted by counsel for the
petitioner that suit titled as S. Joginder Singh versus Parmeshwar Kaur and others
no.1445 of 1993 and the Suit titled as Jagjit Singh versus Inderjeet Singh and others
be transferred to this Court and consolidated with Civil Suit CS(OS) 213 of 2007 on
the ground that no prejudice would be to caused to any of the parties if the two suits
were transferred to this Court. It is also contended that the evidence to be led in all
the aforesaid suits was identical and this would avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
2. This petition is opposed by respondent stating that the present petition is
misconceived and misuse of judicial process and is not maintainable. It is submitted
that the Suit bearing No.25 of 2007 titled as Dalbir Kaur and others verus Inderjeet
Singh and other was pending for the last 16 years and the petitioner herein was
OMP 584.08 Dalbir Kaur vs. Inderjeet Singh & Ors. Page 1 Of 2 delaying the said suit. The suit was for permanent injunction restraining respondents
from selling the property bearing no.22, Block-A, Lajpat Nagar-III, New Delhi. The
suit titled Jagjit Singh versus Inderjeet Singh and other filed in January 2006 by the
petitioner herein was in respect to property bearing no. 22, Block-A, Lajpat Nagar-
III, New Delhi whereas the suit pending in this Court was in respect to property
bearing no.22, Saman Bazar, Jungpura, New Delhi. Hence, not only the suits were in
respect of different properties but also the issues involved were different and
consolidation of the suits would serve no purpose and would prejudice the rights of
the parties.
3. I have gone through the plaint of the three suits and the defence taken. I
consider that since the suit pending in this Court is in respect of all together different
property, though the parties are somewhat similar, the defence of defendants in
different suits is also different and the points to be decided in respect of the two
properties are different. Calling of two suits from District Court to this Court would in
fact prejudice different parties and it cannot be said that the evidence in all the suits
would be same.
4. I find no merit in this petition. The petition is hereby dismissed. No orders as
to costs.
January 20, 2010 SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA J. rd OMP 584.08 Dalbir Kaur vs. Inderjeet Singh & Ors. Page 2 Of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!