Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 218 Del
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P. (C.) No.243/2010
% Date of Decision: 15.01.2010
Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors .... Petitioners
Through Mr.Manjit Singh, Advocate.
Versus
HC Suraj Bhan .... Respondents
Through Mr.Anil Singal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOOL CHAND GARG
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be YES
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in NO
the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
The respondent along with another HC Rohtas Singh and others
were allegedly found conducting unauthorized checking of vehicles and
realizing compounding amounts leading to disciplinary proceedings and
imposition of punishment.
Co-accused/delinquent Sh. Rohtas Singh had filed an original
application being O.A No.94/2007 against the punishment awarded to
him, which was allowed by the Central Administrative Tribunal by order
dated 30th June, 2009 and punishment imposed was set aside. Since
the punishment awarded to the co-accused/delinquent was set aside,
the Tribunal also set aside the punishment awarded to the respondent
by order dated 6th August, 2009 in O.A No.2585/2004 titled HC Suraj
Bhan v. Commissioner of Police and Ors. It was also held that the
respondent shall be entitled for all the benefits which had been granted
to the HC Rohtas Singh in O.A No.94/2009. While deciding the petition
the Tribunal has also held that the petitioner shall ensure that sealed
covers in respect of the respondent shall be opened and if the
respondent shall be found eligible, he would be given promotion as
admissible by Rules.
Against the order dated 30th June, 2009 in O.A No.94/2007
which was passed in favour of HC Rohtas Singh, a writ petition being
W.P(C) No.152/2010 titled Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors v. HC
Rohtas Singh was filed which was also dismissed by this Court by order
dated 12th January, 2010.
In the circumstances, there are no grounds to interfere with the
order of the Tribunal dated 6th August, 2009 in O.A No.2585/2004
titled Suraj Bhan v. Commissioner of Police and Ors.
The writ petition in the facts and circumstances is without any
merit and it is, therefore, dismissed.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
JANUARY 15, 2010 MOOL CHAND GARG, J. 'k'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!