Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Commr. Of Income Tax vs M/S Internatilonal Research Park ...
2010 Latest Caselaw 16 Del

Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 16 Del
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2010

Delhi High Court
Commr. Of Income Tax vs M/S Internatilonal Research Park ... on 6 January, 2010
Author: Badar Durrez Ahmed
             THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                                         Judgment delivered on: 06.01.2010

+      ITR 8/2001 & ITR 16/2001

COMMR. OF INCOME TAX                                           ..... Petitioner

                                        versus

M/S INTERNATILONAL
RESEARCH PARK LAB. LTD                                         ..... Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case:-

For the Petitioner           : Ms P. L. Bansal with Mr Paras Chaudhry
For the Respondent           : None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest?

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL)

1. In these two references for the assessment years 1990-1991 and 1991-

1992, the following questions were referred to us for our decision:-

(1) Whether the Tribunal is right in holding that for determining the quantum of deduction in respect of profits derived from export u/s 80HHC, the entire profits computed under the head "profits and gains of business or profession" including the income of the nature of commission is to be taken into account?

(2) Whether the Tribunal is right in holding that commission received by the assessee on assignment of export orders to another party in India will form part of profits eligible for deduction u/s 80HHC?

It is not necessary for us to examine these questions in detail inasmuch as

the same are covered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue in

view of the Supreme Court decisions in the cases of P. R. Prabhakar v. CIT

: (2006) 284 ITR 548 (SC) and CIT v. Baby Marine Exports : (2007) 290

ITR 323 (SC). Consequently, both the questions referred to us in these

references are decided against the revenue and in favour of the assessee,

following the Supreme Court decision referred to above. The references

stand answered accordingly.

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J JANUARY 06, 2010 SR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter