Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Balvinder Kaur & Ors vs Dtc & Anr
2010 Latest Caselaw 137 Del

Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 137 Del
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2010

Delhi High Court
Balvinder Kaur & Ors vs Dtc & Anr on 13 January, 2010
Author: J.R. Midha
Regular
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                      +     FAO No.202/1996

                               Date of Decision: 13th January, 2010
%

      BALVINDER KAUR & ORS          ..... Appellants
               Through : Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv.

                   versus

      DTC & ANR               ..... Respondents
               Through : Mr. Ataul Haque, Adv. for R-1.

CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.        Whether Reporters of Local papers may               YES
          be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.        To be referred to the Reporter or not?              YES

3.        Whether the judgment should be                      YES
          reported in the Digest?

                          JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The appellants have challenged the award of the

learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.5,75,000/- has

been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek

enhancement of the award amount.

2. The accident dated 10th December, 1986 resulted in the

death of Kuldeep Singh. The deceased was survived by his

widow, daughter and son who filed the claim petition before

the learned Tribunal.

3. The deceased was aged 46 years at the time of the

accident and was working as a Wing Commander in Ministry

of Defence earning Rs.10,000/- per month. The learned

Tribunal deducted 1/3rd towards the personal expenses of the

deceased and applied the multiplier of 7 to compute the loss

of dependency at Rs.5,60,000/-. Rs.15,000/- has been

awarded for loss of consortium and loss of estate. The total

compensation awarded is Rs.5,75,000/-.

4. The learned counsel for the appellants has urged the

following grounds at the time of hearing of this appeal:-

(i) The multiplier be enhanced from 7 to 13.

(i) The future prospects of the deceased be taken

into consideration.

(iii) Compensation be awarded for loss of love and

affection and funeral expenses.

5. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sarla Verma

Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, 2009 (6) Scale 129

held that the appropriate multiplier at the age of 46 years to

be 13 and 30% should be added towards the future

prospects in respect of the deceased aged between 40 to 50

years.

6. Following the aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court, the multiplier is enhanced from 7 to 13 and

30% is added towards the future prospects.

7. The income of the deceased for computation of

compensation is taken to be Rs.13,000/- per month

(Rs.10,000 + 30% of Rs.10,000).

8. Taking the income of the deceased to be Rs.13,000/-

per month, deducting 1/3rd towards the personal expenses of

the deceased and applying the multiplier of 13, the loss of

dependency is computed to be Rs.13,52,000/- (Rs.13,000 x

12 x 2/3 x 13).

9. The learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.15,000/- towards

loss of consortium and loss of estate. However, no

compensation has been awarded for loss of love and

affection and funeral expenses. Rs.10,000/- is awarded

towards loss of love and affection and Rs.5,000/- towards

funeral expenses. The total compensation is computed to be

Rs.13,82,000/- (Rs.13,52,000 + Rs.15,000 + Rs.10,000 +

Rs.5,000).

10. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is

enhanced from Rs.5,75,000/- to Rs.13,82,000/-. The learned

Tribunal has awarded interest @12% per annum which is not

disturbed on the original award amount of Rs.5,75,000/-.

However, on the enhanced award amount, the rate of

interest shall be @7.5% per annum from the date of filing of

the petition till realization.

11. The enhanced award amount along with interest be

deposited by respondent No.1 with UCO Bank, Delhi High

Court Branch A/c Balvinder Kaur through Mr. M.M. Tandon,

Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street,

New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) within 30 days.

12. Upon the aforesaid amount being deposited, UCO Bank

is directed to keep a sum of Rs.19,00,000/- in fixed deposit in

the following manner:-

(i) Fixed deposit of Rs.9,00,000/- in the name of

appellant No.1 for a period of three years.

(ii) Fixed deposit of Rs.5,00,000/- in the name of

appellant No.2 for a period of three years.

(iii) Fixed deposit of Rs.5,00,000/- in the name of

appellant No.3 for a period of three years.

13. The remaining amount be released to the appellants in

the following proportion:-

      (i)     Appellant No.1 :       50%
      (ii)    Appellant No.2 :       25%
      (iii)   Appellant No.3 :       25%

14. The interest on all the aforesaid fixed deposits shall be

paid monthly by automatic credit of interest in the respective

Savings Accounts of the appellants.

15. Withdrawal from the aforesaid account shall be

permitted to the appellants after due verification and the

Bank shall issue photo Identity Card to the appellants to

facilitate identity.

16. No cheque book be issued to the appellants without the

permission of this Court.

17. The original Fixed Deposit Receipts shall be retained by

the Bank in the safe custody. However, the original Pass

Book shall be given to the appellants along with the

photocopy of the FDRs.

18. The original Fixed Deposit Receipts shall be handed

over to the appellants on the expiry of the period of the

FDRs.

19. No loan, advance or withdrawal shall be allowed on the

said fixed deposit receipts without the permission of this

Court.

20. Half yearly statement of account be filed by the Bank in

this Court.

21. On the request of the appellants, the Bank shall

transfer the Savings Account to any other branch of UCO

Bank according to the convenience of the appellants.

22. Appellants No.1 to 3 shall furnish all the relevant

documents for opening of the Saving Bank Account and Fixed

Deposit Account to Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-Retail Team,

UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street, New Delhi.

23. Copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for the

parties under the signature of the Court Master.

24. Copy of this order be also sent to Mr. M.M. Tandon,

Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street,

New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) through the UCO Bank,

High Court Branch under the signature of Court Master.

J.R. MIDHA, J JANUARY 13, 2010 mk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter