Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Meera & Anr vs Sarabjeet Singh & Anr
2010 Latest Caselaw 116 Del

Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 116 Del
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2010

Delhi High Court
Meera & Anr vs Sarabjeet Singh & Anr on 12 January, 2010
Author: J.R. Midha
46
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                    +     MAC.APP.No.7/2010

                              Date of Decision: 12th January, 2010
%

      MEERA & ANR                     ..... Appellants
                         Through : Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv.
                    versus

    SARABJEET SINGH & ANR         ..... Respondents
                  Through : Mr. S.L.Gupta, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.      Whether Reporters of Local papers may                 YES
        be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.      To be referred to the Reporter or not?                YES

3.      Whether the judgment should be                        YES
        reported in the Digest?

                        JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Issue notice to respondent No.3 only.

2. Mr. S.L. Gupta, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of

respondent No.3.

3. The appeal involves a very short point and can be

disposed of without requisitioning the Trial Court Record and,

therefore, the appeal has been heard finally at admission

stage itself.

4. The appellants have challenged the award of the

learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.5,74,000/- has

been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek

enhancement of the award amount.

5. The accident dated 3rd May, 2007 resulted in the death

of Mahender. The deceased was survived by his widow, one

son, one daughter and parents who filed the claim petition

before the learned Tribunal.

6. The deceased was aged 32 years at the time of the

accident. It was claimed that the deceased was working as a

mason. In the absence of sufficient evidence to prove the

income, the learned Tribunal took the minimum wages of

Rs.3,500/-, deducted 1/4th towards personal expenses of the

deceased and applied the multiplier of 16 to compute the

loss of dependency at Rs.5,04,000/-. Rs.10,000/- has been

awarded towards loss of consortium, Rs.5,000/- towards loss

of estate, Rs.50,000/- towards loss of love and affection and

Rs.5,000/- towards funeral expenses. The total

compensation awarded is Rs.5,74,000/-.

7. The only ground urged by learned counsel for the

appellant at the time of hearing of this appeal is that the

increase in minimum wages due to inflation and rise in price

index is not taken into consideration.

8. It is well settled by the catena of judgments of this

Court in the cases of Kanwar Devi vs. Bansal Roadways,

2008 ACJ 2182, National Insurance Company Limited

vs. Renu Devi III (2008) ACC 134 and UPSRTC vs.

Munni Devi, MAC.APP.No.310/2007 decided on

28.07.2008 that the Court should take judicial notice of

increase in minimum wages to meet the increase in price

index and inflation rate. The Court has taken the view that

the minimum wages get doubled over the period of 10 years

and increase in minimum wages is not akin to future

prospects and the income should be computed by taking the

average of minimum wages and its double.

9. Following the aforesaid judgments, the income of the

deceased for computation of compensation is taken to be

Rs.5,250/- [(Rs.3,500 + Rs.7,000)/2]. Deducting 1/4th

towards personal expenses and applying the multiplier of 16,

the loss of dependency is computed to be Rs.7,56,000/-

(Rs.5,250 x 12 x 3/4 x 16). Adding Rs.10,000/- towards loss

of consortium, Rs.5,000/- towards loss of estate, Rs.50,000/-

towards loss of love and affection and Rs.5,000/- towards

funeral expenses, the total compensation is computed to be

Rs.8,26,000/- (Rs.7,56,000 + Rs.10,000 + Rs.5,000 +

Rs.50,000 + Rs.5,000).

10. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is

enhanced from Rs.5,74,000/- to Rs.8,26,000/- along with

interest @7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the

petition till realization.

11. The enhanced award amount along with interest be

deposited by respondent No.3 with UCO Bank, Delhi High

Court Branch A/c Meera through Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-

Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street, New Delhi

(Mobile No. 09310356400) within 30 days.

12. Upon the aforesaid amount being deposited, UCO Bank

is directed to keep a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- in fixed deposit in

the following manner:-

(i) Fixed deposit of Rs.50,000/- in the name of

appellant No.1 for a period of one year.

(ii) Fixed deposit of Rs.50,000/- in the name of

appellant No.1 for a period of two years.

(iii) Fixed deposit of Rs.50,000/- in the name of

appellant No.1 for a period of three years.

(iv) Fixed deposit of Rs.50,000/- in the name of

appellant No.3 till she attains majority.

(v) Fixed deposit of Rs.50,000/- in the name of

appellant No.2 till he attains majority.

13. The remaining amount be released to appellant No.1 by

transferring the same to her Savings Bank Account.

14. The interest on all the aforesaid fixed deposits shall be

paid monthly by automatic credit of interest in the Savings

Account of appellant No.1.

15. Withdrawal from the aforesaid account shall be

permitted to appellant No.1 after due verification and the

Bank shall issue photo Identity Card to appellant No.1 to

facilitate identity.

16. No cheque book be issued to appellant No.1 without the

permission of this Court.

17. The original Fixed Deposit Receipts shall be retained by

the Bank in the safe custody. However, the original Pass

Book shall be given to appellant No.1 along with the

photocopy of the FDRs.

18. The original Fixed Deposit Receipts shall be handed

over to the appellants on the expiry of the period of the

FDRs.

19. No loan, advance or withdrawal shall be allowed on the

said fixed deposit receipts without the permission of this

Court.

20. Half yearly statement of account be filed by the Bank in

this Court.

21. On the request of appellant No.1, the Bank shall

transfer the Savings Account to any other branch of UCO

Bank according to the convenience of appellant No.1.

22. Appellant No.1 shall furnish all the relevant documents

for opening of the Saving Bank Account and Fixed Deposit

Account to Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank

Zonal, Parliament Street, New Delhi.

23. Copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for the

parties under the signature of the Court Master.

24. Copy of this order be also sent to Mr. M.M. Tandon,

Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street,

New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) through the UCO Bank,

High Court Branch under the signature of Court Master.

J.R. MIDHA, J JANUARY 12, 2010 aj

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter