Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinod Kr.Gupta vs Raj Kumar & Ors.
2010 Latest Caselaw 700 Del

Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 700 Del
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2010

Delhi High Court
Vinod Kr.Gupta vs Raj Kumar & Ors. on 8 February, 2010
Author: J.R. Midha
30
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                      +     MAC.APP.No.538/2008

                                 Date of Decision: 8th February, 2010
%

      VINOD KR.GUPTA               ..... Appellant
                   Through : Mr. Manish Mannie, Adv.

                      versus

    RAJ KUMAR & ORS.             ..... Respondents
                  Through : Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv.
                             for R-3.
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.      Whether Reporters of Local papers may                   YES
        be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.      To be referred to the Reporter or not?                  YES

3.      Whether the judgment should be                          YES
        reported in the Digest?

                            JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The appellant has challenged the award of the learned

Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.2,35,000/- has been

awarded to him. The appellant seeks enhancement of the

award amount.

2. The accident dated 14th July, 2005 resulted in grievous

injuries to the appellant. The appellant is a practicing lawyer

and he was crossing the road in front of Tis Hazari Courts to

go towards Boulevard Road when a Santro Car bearing

No.DL-1CH-2236 hit him due to which the appellant fell down

and suffered following injuries:-

(i) Fracture Medial Malleolus (L)

(ii) Fracture Posterior Malleolus (L)

(iii) Pott's Fractures (left leg) treated with fixation of

two cancellous screws.

        (iv)    Mal United/Mal-alignment of ankle joint (left)

        (v)     Profusely bleeding.

        (vi)    Multiple abrasions and blunt injuries all over body.

3. The appellant was removed to Aruna Asaf Ali Hospital

where plaster was put on his left leg. The appellant

thereafter took the treatment from Lal Bahadur Shastri

Hospital where he was advised for close reduction and POP

cast. The appellant remained admitted in Lal Bahadur

Shastri Hospital for two days. The appellant was advised for

a operation for open reduction and internal fixation of two

screws in left ankle. The appellant also consulted Aggarwal

Dharmarth Hospital and Dr. S.P. Mandal from Sir Ganga Ram

Hospital who confirmed the above advice. The appellant

underwent operation on 26th July, 2005 for fixation of two

cancellous screws at Aggarwal Dharmarth Hospital where he

remained admitted till 28th July, 2005. The plaster was

removed on 3rd October, 2005. The appellant continued the

treatment and the screws were removed on 14th April, 2007.

There has been mal-alignment of ankle joint and the

appellant has suffered permanent disability which has been

assessed to be 65% in respect of the left lower limb.

4. The learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.30,000/- towards

medical treatment, Rs.10,000/- towards conveyance charges,

Rs.5,000/- towards special diet, Rs.40,000/- towards pain and

agony, Rs.60,000/- towards loss of income during the

treatment and Rs.90,000/- towards loss of earning capacity.

The total compensation awarded is Rs.2,35,000/-.

5. The learned counsel for the appellant has urged the

following grounds at the time of hearing of this appeal:-

(i) The loss of income and loss of earning capacity be

enhanced.

(ii) The compensation for pain and suffering be

enhanced.

(iii) The compensation be awarded for loss of

amenities of life.

(iv) The compensation be awarded for disfiguration.

6. With respect to the compensation for loss of income

and earning capacity, the appellant appeared in the witness

box as PW-4 and proved that the appellant was earning

Rs.8,000/- per month. However, the learned Tribunal has

taken his income to be Rs.5,000/- per month without any

basis. The learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that

the appellant has not filed any documentary proof or Income

Tax Return to prove the income of Rs.8,000/-. The learned

counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is a

practicing lawyer having 20 years experience but since the

appellant's income was below taxable limits, no Income Tax

Return was being filed. In the facts and circumstances of this

case, the income of the appellant is taken to be Rs.8,000/-

per month.

7. The appellant was aged 58 years at the time of the

accident and the appropriate multiplier at the age of 58

years is 9 whereas the learned Tribunal has applied the

multiplier of 5. The multiplier is, therefore, enhanced from 5

to 9. Taking the income of the appellant to be Rs.8,000/- per

month, applying the multiplier of 9 and taking the loss of

earning capacity to be 30%, the compensation for loss of

earning capacity is enhanced from Rs.90,000/- to

Rs.2,59,200/- [(Rs.8,000 x 12 x 9) x 30%]. The loss of

income during treatment is enhanced from Rs.60,000/- to

Rs.96,000/- (Rs.8,000 x 12).

8. The appellant has suffered 65% permanent disability in

respect of which the learned Tribunal has awarded

Rs.40,000/- towards pain and agony, which is enhanced to

Rs.50,000/-.

9. The learned Tribunal has not awarded any

compensation for loss of amenities of life as well as

disfiguration. Rs.50,000/- is awarded towards loss of

amenities of life and Rs.50,000/- towards disfiguration.

10. The appellant is entitled to the total compensation of

Rs.5,50,200/- (Rs.2,59,200 + Rs.30,000 + Rs.10,000 +

Rs.5,000 + Rs.50,000 + Rs.96,000 + Rs.50,000 + Rs.50,000)

11. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is

enhanced from Rs.2,35,000/- to Rs.5,50,200/- along with

interest @7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the

petition till realization.

12. The enhanced award amount along with interest be

deposited by respondent No.3 with UCO Bank, Delhi High

Court Branch A/c Vinod Kumar Gupta through Mr. M.M.

Tandon, Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament

Street, New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) within 30 days.

13. Upon the receipt of the aforesaid amount, UCO Bank is

directed to release 50% of the amount to the appellant by

transferring the same to his Saving Bank Account. The

remaining 50% amount be kept in fixed deposit for one year

with cumulative interest.

14. The appellant shall furnish all the relevant documents

for opening of the Saving Bank Account and Fixed Deposit

Account to Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank

Zonal, Parliament Street, New Delhi.

15. Copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for both the

parties under signature of Court Master.

16. Copy of this order be also sent to Mr. M.M. Tandon,

Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street,

New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) through the UCO Bank,

High Court Branch under the signature of Court Master.

J.R. MIDHA, J

FEBRUARY 08, 2010 aj

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter