Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 5855 Del
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Reserve: 15th December, 2010
Date of Order: December 22, 2010
+ Crl. MC No.1209/2010
% 22.12.2010
Sardar Singh & Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus
State & Anr. ...Respondents
Counsels:
Mr. Rajat Wadhwa for petitioners.
Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State/respondent.
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not?
3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?
JUDGMENT
1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been preferred by the petitioners for
quashing of FIR No.626 of 2006 under Sections 147/148/149/323/308/506 IPC
registered at police station Rajouri Garden on the ground of compromise arrived at
between the parties.
2. The complainant was summoned to the court to verify the compromise. However,
the complainant stated that he had agreed to compromise with the petitioners on certain
conditions and these conditions were not fulfilled by the petitioners. According to him oral
assurances were given to him that the petitioners would leave the management and that
the communication tower on Gurudwara shall be removed. He submits that since these
conditions have not been fulfilled, the compromise was not effective.
Crl.MC 1209/2010 Page 1 Of 2
3. Since this petition has been filed for quashing of an FIR on the basis of
compromise and the complainant states that he has not compromised the matter with the
petitioners, this petition is hereby dismissed.
4. The petition stands dismissed.
December 22, 2010 SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J rd Crl.MC 1209/2010 Page 2 Of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!