Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 5553 Del
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Reserve: 24th November 2010
Date of Order: December 06, 2010
+ W.P(Crl.) 1419/2010
% 06.12.2010
Rakesh Saraha ...Petitioner
Versus
State ...Respondent
Counsels:
Ms. Neha Jain for petitioner.
Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State/respondent.
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not?
3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?
JUDGMENT
1. By way of present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed an order 9th August
2010 whereby the application of petitioner for grant of parole was dismissed.
2. The petitioner is undergoing sentence for ransom kidnapping. His appeal was
dismissed by this Court on 14th December 2007. It seems that the petitioner was a
hardened criminal as he was involved in another case of ransom kidnapping for which he
is facing trial. Looking at the antecedents of the petitioner, I am afraid there is every
possibility that the petitioner if released on parole, may indulge into another heinous
crime. I find no reason to allow this petition. The petition is hereby dismissed.
December 06, 2010 SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J rd WP(Crl.) No. 1419/2010 Page 1 Of 1
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!