Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 3700 Del
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) No. 3580/2010
Reserved on : 4th August, 2010
Pronounced on: 9th August, 2010
MR. VIVEK SINGH ...... Petitioner
Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate
with Ms. Alka, Advocate.
VERSUS
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ANR. ....Respondents
Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate
for respondent No.1.
Mr. Pranav Kishore Jha,
Advocate for Mr. Lajwinder
Singh, Advocate for the
respondent No.2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
% JUDGMENT
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
In view of the judgment passed in WP(C) No. 8221/2009, this
writ petition is allowed and it is held that concerned DRT at Delhi
would have territorial jurisdiction and the finding that only the DRT
W.P.(C) No.3580/2010 Page 1 of 2
Chandigarh would have jurisdiction is therefore set aside. The general
order dated 17.10.2008 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate
Tribunal that only such DRT would have jurisdiction where the
original application is filed by the bank and not where the mortgaged
property is situated is accordingly quashed and set aside.
Copy of the judgment in W.P.(C) No. 8221/2009 be placed in the
file of this case.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
AUGUST 09, 2010 SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. ib/Ne
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!