Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. vs Ram Kishan & Ors.
2010 Latest Caselaw 2090 Del

Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 2090 Del
Judgement Date : 21 April, 2010

Delhi High Court
Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. vs Ram Kishan & Ors. on 21 April, 2010
Author: J.R. Midha
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                      +   MAC.APP.No.247/2009

                                Date of Decision: 21st April, 2010
%

      ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.     ..... Appellant
                    Through : Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Adv.

                      versus

    RAM KISHAN & ORS.          ..... Respondents
                  Through : Mr. R.K. Bachchan, Adv. for
                             R-1 and R-2.
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.      Whether Reporters of Local papers may               YES
        be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.      To be referred to the Reporter or not?              YES

3.      Whether the judgment should be                      YES
        reported in the Digest?

                          JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The appellant has challenged the award of the learned

Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.7,35,000/- has been

awarded to claimants/respondents No. 1 and 2.

2. The accident dated 1st February, 2006 resulted in the

death of Sunil Kumar. The deceased was survived by his

parents who filed the claim petition before the learned

Tribunal.

3. The deceased was aged 18 years at the time of the

accident and was self employed earning Rs.6,000/- per

month. The learned Tribunal took the income of the

deceased to be Rs.7,438/- per month, deducted 1/2 towards

his personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 15 to

compute the loss of dependency at Rs.6,69,420/-. The

learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.50,000/- towards loss of

love and affection and Rs. 15,000/- towards funeral

expenses. The learned Tribunal has awarded total

compensation of Rs.7,35,000/- to claimants/respondents

No.1 and 2.

4. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the

deceased was self employed and, therefore, the future

prospects could not have been taken into consideration

according to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the

case of Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation,

2009 (6) Scale 129. The contention of learned counsel for

the appellant is accepted. The deceased was self employed

earning Rs.6,000/- per month and the learned Tribunal erred

in taking the income of the deceased as Rs.7,438/-. The

income of the deceased is taken as Rs.6,000/- per month, 1/2

is deducted towards his personal expenses and multiplier of

15 is applied to compute the loss of dependency at

Rs.5,40,000/- (Rs.6,000 x 1/2 x 12 x 15).

5. The Claims Tribunal has not awarded any

compensation for loss of estate. Rs.30,000/- is awarded

towards loss of estate. The respondents No.1 and 2 are

entitled to the total compensation of Rs.6,35,000/-

(Rs.5,40,000 + Rs.50,000 + Rs.15,000 + Rs.30,000)

10. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is reduced

from Rs.7,35,000/- to Rs.6,35,000/- along with interest

@7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till

realization.

11. The appellant has deposited the entire award amount

along with interest with the Claims Tribunal after adjusting

the statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited in this appeal,

out of which Rs.1,00,000/- has been released to the

claimants and remaining amount is lying in the fixed deposit

and the original fixed deposits have been retained by the

Claims Tribunal. The statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- be

refunded to the appellant within 30 days.

12. The appellant is entitled to refund of Rs.75,000/-

(Rs.7,35,000 - Rs.6,35,000) along with interest paid by them

on the said amount after adjusting the statutory amount of

Rs.25,000/-. It is clarified that the appellant shall be entitled

only to the interest paid by them on Rs.75,000/- while

depositing the award amount.

13. The Claims Tribunal is directed to discharge all the

pending fixed deposit receipts and direct the Bank to refund

the amount in terms of this judgment to the appellant within

two weeks.

14. With respect to the remaining amount, the Claims

Tribunal is directed to release 10% of the amount to

respondents/claimants No.1 and 2 by transferring the said

amount to their Saving Bank Account. The remaining

amount be kept in the joint names of respondents/claimants

No.1 and 2 in the following manner:-

(i) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the amount for

a period of six months.

(ii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the amount for

a period of one year.

(iii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the amount for

a period of one and a half years.

(iv) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the amount for

a period of two years.

(v) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the amount for

a period of two and a half years.

(vi) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the amount for

a period of three years.

(vii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the amount for

a period of three and a half years.

(viii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the amount for

a period of four years.

(ix) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the amount for

a period of four and a half years.

15. The interest on the aforesaid fixed deposits shall be

paid monthly by automatic credit of interest in the joint

Savings Account of respondents/claimants No.1 and 2.

16. Withdrawal from the aforesaid account shall be

permitted to respondents/claimants No.1 and 2 after due

verification and the Bank shall issue photo Identity Card to

respondents/claimants No.1 and 2 to facilitate identity.

17. No cheque book be issued to respondents/claimants

No.1 and 2 without the permission of this Court.

18. The Bank shall issue Fixed Deposit Pass Book instead of

the FDRs to respondents/claimants No.1 and 2 and the

maturity amount of the FDRs be automatically credited to the

Saving Bank Account of the beneficiaries at the end of the

FDR.

19. No loan, advance or withdrawal shall be allowed on the

said fixed deposit receipts without the permission of this

Court.

20. Half yearly statement of account be filed by the Bank in

this Court.

21. On the request of respondents/claimants No.1 and 2,

the Bank shall transfer the Savings Account to any other

branch according to their convenience.

22. Respondents/claimants No.1 and 2 shall furnish all the

relevant documents for opening of the Saving Bank Account

and Fixed Deposit Account to Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-

Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street, New Delhi.

23. Copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for both the

parties under the signatures of the Court Master.

24. Copy of this order be also sent to Mr. M.M. Tandon,

Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street,

New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) through the UCO Bank,

High Court Branch under the signature of Court Master.

J.R. MIDHA, J APRIL 21, 2010 mk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter