Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 3633 Del
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ S.T. Appeal No. 11/2009
Reserved on : August 19, 2009
Pronounced on : September 8, 2009
COMMISSIONER, VAT, TRADE AND TAXES
DEPARTMENT ...Appellant
Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, ASG with
Mr. H.C. Bhatia, Mr. H.L. Taneja, Advocates
VERSUS
SEHGAL TOURISTS ....Respondent
Through: Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocate CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
% VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J
1. For the reasons stated in S.T. Appeal No. 10/2009 titled as
Commissioner, VAT, Trade and Taxes Department vs. International
Travel House Ltd., the present appeal is also dismissed. We hold in the
S.T. Appeal No. 11/2009 Page 1 facts of the present case that neither the contract in question can be
artificially split up/severed and also that the possession and control of the
vehicles continue to remain with the owner of the vehicles and thus there
is no transfer of the right to use the goods as envisaged in Article
366(29A)(d).
2. The appeal is dismissed leaving the parties to bear their own costs.
VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J
A.K. SIKRI, J
September 8, 2009
dkg
S.T. Appeal No. 11/2009 Page 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!