Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 3520 Del
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P(C) No.8431/2009
% Date of Decision: 02.09.2009
Dr. Tripti Talapatra .... Petitioner
Through Mr. Hiren Dasan & Mr. Dhirendra
Kumar Mishra, Advocates
Versus
National Board of Examinations & Ors. .... Respondent
Through Dr. Rakesh Gosain, Advocate for
respondent no. 1.
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
for respondent no. 5.
Ms. Amita Singh, Advocate for
respondent nos. 6 & 7/UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be YES
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in NO
the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 on instructions
had stated on 20th August, 2009 that the petitioner shall be permitted
to appear in the forthcoming examination in DNB(C.T.S.) to be held on
2nd Saturday of December, 2009.
In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the respondent
No.1, counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that the writ petition be disposed of as the petitioner has been permitted to appear in
DNB(C.T.S.) examination to be held on 2nd Saturday of December, 2009.
Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the
statement of the learned counsel for the respondent and parties are left
to bear their own costs.
All the pending applications are also disposed of.
Dasti.
September 02, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. 'rs'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!