Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 4551 Del
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Reserve: October 22, 2009
Date of Order: November 09, 2009
+IA 13139 of 2009 in CS(OS) 2248 of 2007
% 09.11.2009
M/s Ecolab Inc. ...Plaintiff
Through: Mr. K.G. Bansal, Advocates
Versus
M/s Eaco Labs Ltd. ...Defendant
Through: Nemo
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not?
3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?
ORDER
1. This application under Section 151 of CPC has been made by the applicant/
plaintiff seeking exemption from appearing in person for tendering an affidavit in an ex
parte evidence.
2. Learned counsel for plaintiff has relied on Glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals Ltd. v
Theodar Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. 2006(32) PTC 629 (Del.) wherein this Court had held that
in view of Order 19 Rule 2 CPC such an application can be allowed and personal
appearance of a witness can be dispensed with. To the same effect Judgment of the
Supreme Court in Ameer Trading Corporation Ltd. v Shapoorji Data Proceessing Ltd. JT
2003(9) SC 109 wherein the Supreme Court held that the presence of a party during
examination in chief was not imperative and if any objection is taken to any statement
CS(OS) 2248 of 2007 M/s Ecolab Inc. v. M/s Eaco Labs Ltd. Page 1 Of 2 made in the affidavit, the said objection can be taken before the Court in writing and the
witness be called in case he is desired to be cross examined.
3. In view of above facts and settled legal position, I allow this application. The
personal appearance of witness is hereby dispensed with.
November 09, 2009 SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA J. rd CS(OS) 2248 of 2007 M/s Ecolab Inc. v. M/s Eaco Labs Ltd. Page 2 Of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!