Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 4444 Del
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2009
23
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ MAC.APP.No.385/2009
% Date of decision: 3rd November, 2009
LAJWANTI ..... Appellant
Through : Mr. R.K. Rawat, Adv.
versus
BHAG CHAND & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through : Ms. Hetu Arora, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may YES
be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? YES
3. Whether the judgment should be YES
reported in the Digest?
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. The appellant has challenged the award of the learned
Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.2,62,655/- has been
awarded to the appellant.
2. The accident dated 10th October, 2000 resulted in grievous
injuries to the appellant who filed the claim petition before the
learned Tribunal.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
appellant has suffered permanent disability in respect of right leg
but no compensation has been awarded for permanent disability
on the ground that the medical certificate - Ex.PW5/A shows the
disability relates to left leg with ankle and restricted movement of
ankle whereas the appellant suffered the injuries on the right side
of the body in the accident in question.
4. Vide order dated 11th August, 2009, the appellant was
directed to appear before the Senior Orthopedic Surgeon, Batra
Hospital for examination.
5. The appellant has been examined by Dr. Sameer Grover,
Senior Orthopedic Surgeon, Batra Hospital in terms of the order
dated 11th August, 2009 and the medical certificate dated 7 th
September, 2009 has been today placed on record. As per the
said certificate, the appellant has suffered 40% disability of right
lower limb and 20% with respect to the whole body. On the basis
of the certificate dated 7th September, 2009 issued by Batra
Hospital, it is clear that the appellant has suffered permanent
disability in respect of the right lower limb and the findings of the
learned Tribunal are not correct.
6. In view of the above, the appeal is allowed and the
impugned award is set aside in so far as the learned Tribunal has
rejected the claim of compensation in respect of the permanent
disability suffered by the appellant.
7. The case is remanded back to the learned Tribunal to
determine/assess the compensation payable to the appellant
relating to the permanent disability suffered by her. The original
report of Dr. Sameer Grover dated 7 th September, 2009 be sent
to the learned Tribunal along with the LCR.
8. The parties are directed to appear before the learned
Tribunal on 2nd December, 2009.
9. The learned Tribunal shall conduct an inquiry under Section
168 of the Motor Vehicles Act and pass a fresh award in
accordance with law. The amount received by the appellant in
terms of the award of the learned Tribunal shall be retained by
the appellant subject to the final outcome of the claim petition.
Needless to state that the learned Tribunal shall grant
appropriate opportunity to both the parties before deciding the
claim petition afresh and passing the award.
10. Copy of this order be given 'Dasti' to learned counsel for the
parties under signature of Court Master.
J.R. MIDHA, J NOVEMBER 03, 2009 aj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!