Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Asha Devi & Ors. vs Jitender Sharma & Ors.
2009 Latest Caselaw 781 Del

Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 781 Del
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2009

Delhi High Court
Asha Devi & Ors. vs Jitender Sharma & Ors. on 6 March, 2009
Author: J.R. Midha
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                        +     MAC.APP.509/2008

%                                   Date of decision: 6th March, 2009

      ASHA DEVI & ORS.                         ..... Appellants
                    Through : Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv.

                  versus


    JITENDER SHARMA & ORS.              ..... Respondents
                  Through : Mr. Mohan Babu Aggarwal,
                            Adv. for R - 3.
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.     Whether Reporters of Local papers may
       be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.     To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3.     Whether the judgment should be
       reported in the Digest?

                             JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Issue notice to respondent No.3 only.

2. Mr. Mohan Babu Aggarwal, Advocate accepts notice on

behalf of respondent No.3.

3. With the consent of the parties, the matter is finally heard

at admission stage.

4. The appellants have challenged the award of the Learned

Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.5,10,000/- has been

awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek enhancement of

the award amount.

5. This case relates to the death of Manoj Kumar in a road

accident involving truck bearing No.UP-14J-9233 on 24th

September, 2005. The deceased was coming home on foot after

buying atta for his family when he was hit by the offending truck

near Pahalwan Market, Loni resulting in his death.

6. The deceased was survived by his parents aged 46 and 50

years who filed the claim petition before the Learned Tribunal.

The deceased was aged 22 years at the time of the accident and

was doing computer job earning Rs.6,000/- per month. However,

no documentary proof was produced before the Learned Tribunal

and, therefore, the Learned Tribunal took the income of the

deceased according to the minimum wages at Rs.3,589/-. The

figure of minimum wages was rounded off as Rs.4,000/- per

month.

7. The learned Tribunal deducted 1/3rd towards the personal

expenses of the deceased and the multiplier of 15 was applied

considering the age of the parents to compute the loss of

dependency at Rs.4,18,000/-. Rs.30,000/- has been awarded

towards loss of estate, funeral expenses and transportation

expenses of the dead body. The total compensation awarded is

Rs.5,10,000/-.

8. The appellants have challenged the impugned award on the

following grounds:-

(i) The Learned Tribunal did not consider the increase of

minimum wages on account of cost neutralization,

increase in cost of living and inflation.

(ii) No amount has been awarded towards loss of love and

affection and loss of company to the appellants.

9. Learned counsel for the appellant refers to and relies upon

the judgments of Kanwar Devi vs. Bansal Roadways, 2008

ACJ 2182, Lekh Raj vs Suram Singh, 2007 ACJ 2165 and

National Insurance Company Limited vs. Renu Devi, III

(2008) ACC 134 where the Court has taken the judicial notice of

the increase in minimum wages. The Courts have taken the

average of minimum wages and the double of it and computed

the loss of income of the deceased. Following the aforesaid

judgments, the income of the deceased is computed by taking

the average of minimum wages of Rs.3,589 per month and

double of it, i.e.,Rs.7,178/- which comes to Rs.5,385/- [(3,589 +

7,178)/2] and after deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses of

the deceased and applying the multiplier of 15, loss of

dependency of the appellants is computed at Rs.6,46,200/-

(Rs.5,385 x 2/3 x 12 x 15).

10. The Learned Tribunal has not awarded any amount towards

loss of love and affection and loss of company of the deceased to

the appellants. The compensation computed on the basis of

multiplier is the pecuniary damage payable to the appellants.

The appellants are also entitled to non-pecuniary damages for

loss of love and affection and company. These damages are

conventional in nature and should be uniformly awarded.

Following the recent judgments, I award Rs.25,000/- towards loss

of love and affection and company of the deceased to the

appellants. The total compensation comes to Rs.7,01,200/-

(Rs.6,46,200 + Rs.30,000 + Rs.25,000).

11. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. The award amount is

enhanced from Rs.5,10,000/- to Rs.7,01,200/- on which the

appellant shall be entitled to interest @ 7.5% per annum from the

date of filing of the petition before the Learned Tribunal till the

date of award.

J.R. MIDHA, J th 6 March, 2009 mk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter