Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 2969 Del
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P(C) No.9204/2009
% Date of Decision: 31.07.2009
Gurmant Kalra & Anr. .... Petitioners
Through Mr.Kirti Uppal, Advocate.
Versus
New Delhi Municipal Council .... Respondent
Through Mr.Ashutosh Lohia, Addl.Standing
Counsel, NDMC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be YES
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in NO
the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
Issue notice to the respondent. Mr.Ashutosh Lohia accepts notice.
Mr.Lohia, learned counsel for the respondent states that he has
instructions from the respondent to state that in case the petitioner
makes a representation in accordance with the rules and regulations
regarding de-sealing of the premises, the same shall be considered and
disposed of by the respondent within four weeks.
In view of the representation made by the learned counsel for the
respondent, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the
petitioner to make representation to the respondent about de-sealing of
his premises within one week. Respondent will consider the
representation of the petitioner for de-sealing the premises within four
weeks.
In case the premises will not be de-sealed by the respondent after
consideration and disposal of his representation, the petitioner shall be
entitled to avail any appropriate remedy available to him in accordance
with law.
The writ petition is disposed of in terms hereof. Parties are left to
bear their own cost.
July 31, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. 'k'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!