Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hema Thakur & Ors vs Suraj Bhan & Ors
2009 Latest Caselaw 2966 Del

Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 2966 Del
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2009

Delhi High Court
Hema Thakur & Ors vs Suraj Bhan & Ors on 31 July, 2009
Author: J.R. Midha
15
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                   +       MAC.APP.No.331/2009

                                  Date of Decision: 31st July, 2009
%

      HEMA THAKUR & ORS           ..... Appellants
                   Through : Mr. P.S. Singh, Adv.

                       versus

      SURAJ BHAN & ORS          ..... Respondents
                    Through : Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey,
                              Adv. for R-4.

CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.      Whether Reporters of Local papers may                YES
        be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.      To be referred to the Reporter or not?               YES

3.      Whether the judgment should be                       YES
        reported in the Digest?


                           JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM No.9567/2009 (Delay)

1. For the reasons stated in the application and also

considering that the appellants are three minor children who

lost their father on 4th December, 2008, the delay in filing of

the appeal is condoned.

2. The application stands disposed of.

MAC.APP. No.331/2009

1. The appellants have challenged the award of the

learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.5,80,000/- has

been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek

enhancement of the award amount.

2. The accident dated 7th May, 2001 resulted in the death

of Sanyogita. The deceased was survived by her husband

and three minor children who filed the claim petition before

the learned Tribunal.

3. The deceased was aged 38 years at the time of the

accident and was working with M/s A.I.M.S., Satya Niketan,

New Delhi earning Rs.3,000/- per month. The learned

Tribunal took the income of the deceased at Rs.3,000/- and

added 50% towards the future prospects to compute the

income of the deceased at Rs.4,500/-. After deducting 1/3rd

towards the personal expenses and applying the multiplier of

15, the loss of dependency is computed at Rs.5,40,000/-.

Rs.40,000/- has been awarded towards loss of love and

affection, loss of consortium and funeral expenses. The total

compensation awarded is Rs.5,80,000/-.

4. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the

deceased was aged 38 years at the time of the accident.

The age of the deceased was proved by her school leaving

certificate - Ex.PW1/6. However, the learned Tribunal took

the age of the deceased as 44 years according to the ration

card and applied the multiplier of 15.

5. According to the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles

Act, the appropriate multiplier for the age of 38 years is 16.

According to the recent judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport

Corporation, 2009 (6) Scale 129, the appropriate

multiplier at the age of 38 years is 15. However, considering

the special circumstances of this case, especially that the

appellants are three minor children who also lost their father

after the death of their mother in the accident, as a special

case, this Court is inclined to apply the multiplier of 16 but

this case shall not be treated as a precedent.

6. The learned Tribunal has deducted 1/3rd towards the

personal expenses of the deceased. However, considering

that the deceased left behind four legal representatives,

namely, husband and three minor children, the personal

expenses of the deceased are reduced from 1/3rd to 1/4th.

Applying the multiplier of 16 and taking the personal

expenses of the deceased as 1/4th, the loss of dependency of

the appellant is computed at Rs.6,48,000/- (Rs.4,500 x 3/4 x

12 x 16).

7. The learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.40,000/- towards

loss of love and affection, loss of consortium and funeral

expenses. No compensation has been awarded towards loss

of estate. Considering the facts and circumstances of this

case, especially that after the death of the deceased, the

husband of the deceased also expired on 4 th December, 2008

and the appellants are now three minor children aged 18, 17

and 11 years and they are staying with their paternal uncle,

the compensation of Rs.10,000/- is awarded to each of the

three minor children towards loss of estate. The appellants

are entitled to the total compensation of Rs.7,18,000/-

(Rs.6,48,000 + Rs.40,000 + Rs.10,000 + Rs.10,000 +

Rs.10,000).

8. The appeal is allowed. The award amount is enhanced

from Rs.5,80,000/- to Rs.7,18,000/- along with interest

@7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till

realization.

9. The enhanced amount along with interest be deposited

by respondent No.4 with the learned Tribunal within 30 days.

Upon such deposit being made, the learned Tribunal shall

disburse to the claimants in the same proportion and manner

as in the original award.

10. Copy of this order be given 'Dasti' to learned counsel

for the parties under the signature of Court Master.

J.R. MIDHA, J

JULY 31, 2009 mk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter