Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 2780 Del
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CWP No.9611/2009
% Date of Decision: 22.07.2009
Smt.Mena Mittal .... Petitioner
Through Mr.Maheshwar Dayal, Sr.Advocate with
Mr.Om Prakash Sharma, Advocate.
Versus
Delhi Development Authority & Ors. .... Respondents
Through Mr.Akshay Chandra, Advocate for the
respondent No.1.
Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Advocate with
Mr.H.S.Jaggi, Advocate for the
respondents No.2, 3 & 5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be YES
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in NO
the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
After some arguments, it has been agreed that the petitioner shall
file an appropriate application expeditiously before the trial Court for
appointment of an independent architect. Mr.Sethi on instructions
states that the respondents No.2, 3 & 5/defendants in the suit will not
object to the appointment of an independent architect, however, this
would be without prejudice to the right and contentions of the
defendant about the maintainability and other issues raised in the suit.
The trial Judge shall appoint an independent architect on filing of
application with direction to the architect to give his report
expeditiously. The parties shall also be entitled to file the objections, if
any, to the report of the independent architect.
With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. All the
pending applications are also disposed of.
Dasti to the parties.
July 22, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. 'K'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!