Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 2690 Del
Judgement Date : 17 July, 2009
12
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ MAC.APP.No.589/2008
Date of Decision: 17th July, 2009
%
KULDEEP @ SHIV KUMAR ..... Appellant
Through : Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan,
Adv.
versus
PAWAN KUMAR & ORS .... Respondents
Through : Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Adv.
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may
be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be
reported in the Digest?
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. The appellant is present along with his counsel, Mr. Diwan
Singh Chauhan.
2. Mr. Naresh Wadhawan, Assistant Manager, National
Insurance Co. Ltd., D.R.O. - II is present along with Mr. Pradeep
Gaur, Advocate.
3. The appellant has suffered 20% disability as per the
disability certificate dated 21st October, 2008 which is Annexure-B
to the appeal. The appellant has suffered Post-Traumatic United
Fracture R Tibia with ankle stiffness with permanent disability of
20% in relation to the right lower limb. However, the learned
Tribunal has not awarded any compensation due to the
permanent disability because the disability certificate was issued
to the appellant after the award of the learned Tribunal.
4. As per the award, the income of the appellant has been
taken to be Rs.3,000/- per month according to the minimum
wages. The appellant was aged 36 years at the time of the
accident and applying the multiplier of 15 and treating the
permanent disability of the appellant to be 10% in respect of the
whole body, the loss of income of the appellant due to the
permanent disability is computed to be Rs.54,000/- (10% of
Rs.3,000/- x 12 x 15). The learned Tribunal has not awarded any
compensation for loss of amenities of life. The appellant has
undergone four surgeries and, therefore, loss of amenities is
computed to be Rs.25,000/-. The appellant is also entitled to the
interest on the aforesaid amount of Rs.79,000/- (Rs.54,000 +
Rs.25,000).
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case,
respondent No.3 is ready to settle this case for Rs.1,00,000/- in
full and final settlement of all the claims of the appellant including
the interest.
6. The appellant accepts the full and final settlement for
Rs.1,00,000/-.
7. The settlement between the parties is lawful and in
accordance with law and the settlement is, therefore, accepted.
This Court appreciates the effective assistance of Mr. Pradeep
Gaur, Advocate in resolving this case.
8. The appeal is allowed in terms of the above settlement.
Respondent No.3 shall pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- to the appellant
in full and final settlement within 30 days. Out of the settlement
amount of Rs.1,00,000/-, Rs.50,000/- shall be immediately
released to the appellant and the remaining Rs.50,000/- shall
remain in fixed deposit for a period of five years.
9. Respondent No.3 shall make the payment of the settlement
amount by means of two cheques, one cheque for Rs.50,000/- in
the name of the appellant and the second cheque for Rs.50,000/-
in the name of State Bank of India A/c Kuldeep @ Shiv Kumar.
State Bank of India shall keep Rs.50,000/- in fixed deposit in the
name of the appellant for a period of five years on which
periodical interest be paid to the appellant but no loan, advance
or withdrawal is permitted without the permission of this Court.
10. The appeal stands disposed of.
11. List for compliance on 1st September, 2009.
12. Copy of this order be given 'Dasti' to learned counsel for the
parties under the signature of Court Master. Copy of the order be
also sent to the Mr. H.S. Rawat, Relationship Manager, State Bank
of India, Tis Hazari Branch, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110054 (Mobile
No.9717044322) for issuance of fixed deposit to the appellant.
J.R. MIDHA, J
JULY 17, 2009 aj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!