Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nafe Singh Khatri & Ors. vs Sukhdev Singh & Anr.
2009 Latest Caselaw 2572 Del

Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 2572 Del
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2009

Delhi High Court
Nafe Singh Khatri & Ors. vs Sukhdev Singh & Anr. on 13 July, 2009
Author: J.R. Midha
36
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                    +      FAO.No.151/2003

                                 Date of Decision: 13th July, 2009
%

      NAFE SINGH KHATRI & ORS.             ..... Appellants
                    Through : Mr. A.S. Dateer, Adv.


                  versus


      SUKHDEV SINGH & ANR.              ..... Respondents
                   Through : Ms. Ritu Bhardwaj, Adv.

CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.      Whether Reporters of Local papers may               Yes
        be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.      To be referred to the Reporter or not?              Yes

3.      Whether the judgment should be                      Yes
        reported in the Digest?


                        JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The appellants have challenged the award of the

learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.1,60,704/- has

been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek

enhancement of the award amount.

2. The accident dated 18th April, 1997 resulted in the

death of Sanjay Khatri aged 22 years. The deceased was

survived by his parents and a brother who filed the claim

petition before the learned Tribunal.

3. In the claim petition, it was stated that the deceased

was doing part time job with Prince Ceramic Décor and was

earning Rs.3,500/- per month. The deceased was also

simultaneously studying and was also serving in the factory

of his brother, Gulab Singh. However, since there was

insufficient evidence of income, the learned Tribunal took the

minimum wages of Rs.2,232/- per month and considering the

increase on account of inflation and price index, the loss of

income was taken to be Rs.3,348/- per month. The loss of

dependency of the parents was taken to be 1/3rd and the

multiplier of 12 was applied to compute the loss of

dependency at Rs.1,60,704/-. No amount has been awarded

for loss of love and affection, loss of estate and funeral

expenses.

4. The appellants have raised the following grounds at the

hearing of this appeal:-

(i) The dependency of the appellant be taken to be

1/2 instead of 1/3rd of the income of the deceased.

(ii) The multiplier be enhanced from 12 to 13.

(iii) Compensation be awarded for loss of love and

affection, loss of estate and funeral expenses.

5. With respect to the personal expenses of the deceased,

it is well settled by the recent judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi

Transport Corporation, 2009 (6) Scale 129 that the

personal expenses of unmarried person has to be taken to be

50%. Accordingly, the dependency of the appellants is taken

to be Rs.1,674/- (50% of Rs.3,348/-).

6. The learned Tribunal has applied the multiplier of 12

considering the age of the parents to be 46 and 48 years

respectively. The appropriate multiplier according to the

recent judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Sarla Verma (supra) is 13. The multiplier is accordingly

enhanced from 12 to 13.

7. The learned Tribunal has not awarded any

compensation for loss of love and affection, loss of estate

and funeral expenses. Rs.10,000/- is awarded to each of the

two appellants towards the loss of love and affection.

Rs.10,000/- is awarded towards loss of estate and Rs.5,000/-

is awarded towards funeral expenses. The appellants are

entitled to total compensation of Rs.2,96,144/- (Rs.1,674 X

12 X 13 + Rs.10,000 + Rs.10,000 + Rs.10,000 + Rs.5,000).

8. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is

enhanced from Rs.1,60,704/- to Rs.2,96,144/- along with

interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of

this petition till payment.

9. The enhanced amount along with up to date interest be

deposited by respondent No.2 with the Registrar General of

this Court within 30 days.

10. The appellants shall have equal share in the enhanced

award amount.

11. The order with respect to the disbursement of the

award amount shall be passed on 19th August, 2009.

12. Copy of this order be given 'Dasti' to learned counsel

for the parties under signatures of Court Master.

J.R. MIDHA, J

JULY 13, 2009 mk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter