Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 3238 Del
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ Cont Case (C) No.1530/2006
% Date of Decision: 18.08.2009
Smt.Krishna Sharma .... Petitioner
Through Mr.Gaurav Bhargava, Advocate
Versus
Shri Keshav Chandra .... Respondent
Through Mr.Arjun Pant, Advocate for the
respondent/NDMC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be YES
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in NO
the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
The petitioner had sought initiation of contempt proceedings
against the Secretary of the NDMC on account of recovery of penal rent
and licence fee from the petitioner despite the inter order dated 24th
May, 2006 passed by this Court restraining NDMC to do that.
A reply has been filed on behalf of respondent's/ Secretary,
NDMC contending inter alia that the breach is on account of an
inadvertent error and on account of communication gap. The
respondent has tendered unconditional and unfettered apology for the
same to the court and it is also contended that the penal amount which
had been recovered from the petitioner has been remitted back to the
petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the amount for
penal rent and licence fee which was recovered from the petitioner has
been remitted back to the petitioner.
In view of the remittance of the penal rent and licence fee and
unconditional apology tendered by the respondent, no further action is
required. The notice of contempt issued to the respondent is
discharged.
The contempt petition is disposed of.
August 18, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. 'Dev'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!