Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Delhi Pradesh Citizen Council ... vs Govt Of India & Ors
2009 Latest Caselaw 1748 Del

Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 1748 Del
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2009

Delhi High Court
Delhi Pradesh Citizen Council ... vs Govt Of India & Ors on 29 April, 2009
Author: Ajit Prakash Shah
*             IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                               Date of Decision: April 29, 2009

+    WP(C) No.6623/2008 & C.M. Nos. 12693/2008 & 5695/2009


        DELHI PRADESH CITIZEN COUNCIL (REGD)      ..... Petitioner
                      Through:  Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,
                                Advocate.

                      versus

        GOVT OF INDIA & ORS                           ..... Respondents
                       Through:       Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for
                                      Respondent DDA.
                                      Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate for
                                      Respondent No. 4.
                                      Mr. A. K. Mishra, Advocate for
                                      applicants in C.M. No. 5695 of
                                      2009
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NEERAJ KISHAN KAUL
                   ORDER

29.04.2009

1. In the present writ petition styled as a "Public Interest

Litigation", the grievance of the petitioner is that the public land had

been encroached upon and that the authorities were taking no

positive action in getting the land vacated so as to pave the way for

the public project, namely, Integrated Freight Complex, Madanpur

Khadar.

2. As per the petitioner, a notification was issued under the Land

Acquisition Act, 1894 for acquiring the land in public interest.

Thereafter a declaration was issued under Section 6 of the Land

Acquisition Act, 1894. The writ petition filed by the land owners of

the land came to be dismissed and the Award was passed by the

Land Acquisition Collector for the entire land on 1st December, 1997.

The case of the petitioner is that the possession of the acquired land

to the extent of 232 Bighas has been taken by the Government but

the remaining area of 396 Bighas stands encroached by the original

owners/authorized occupants. It is also the case of the petitioner

that Writ Petition (Civil) No. 760 of 2007 filed by the occupants of the

land was dismissed by this Court on 2nd April 2008. The petitioner

contended that despite this no action has been taken by the

authorities in getting the land vacated so as to pave the way for the

public project of setting up an Integrated Freight Complex.

3. On 21st January, 2009, this Court was informed that the land

in question, which had been acquired by an Award dated 1st

December, 1997 is in the list of unauthorized colonies. The Court

was also told that part of this land was required for city

infrastructure. A provisional certificate had been issued in respect of

this colony and the matter was forwarded to the land owning agency

i.e. Delhi Development Authority (in short „DDA‟) to consider the

issue of regularization in the light of the fact that part of the land was

also required for the city infrastructure. The counsel for the DDA

stated that DDA would take a decision as expeditiously as possible.

4. Today a counter-affidavit on behalf of DDA was placed before

us. As per the DDA, land measuring 628 Bighas 12 Biswas was

acquired in village Aali. The DDA further stated that out of the

acquired land, LAC/L&B Department handed over possession of 232

Bighas 5 Biswas of land to the DDA on 26th May, 1998 and

possession of 8 Bighas 8 Biswas was handed over by LAC/L&B

Department to DDA on 28th July, 2004. However, as per the

affidavit, the possession of remaining 387 Bighas 19 Biswas was not

given to DDA because of the same being built-up. It was further

submitted that possession of the acquired land is first handed over

by LAC to L&B Department and only thereafter the L&B Department

hands over the possession to DDA. The DDA also stated in the

affidavit that Aali Vihar Extension is an unauthorized colony which

apparently is in the list of „Unauthorized Colonies‟. The DDA also

stated in the affidavit that as per the "Revised Guidelines-2007 for

Regularization of Unauthorized Colonies in Delhi", the following types

of colonies or parts thereof would not be considered for

regularization:-

"Colonies/part of colonies which pose hindrances in the provision of infrastructure facilities or fall in the area of ROW of existing/proposed railway lines; Master Plan roads and major/trunk water supply and sewerage lines."

5. As per the DDA, the land of village Aali Vihar forms part of the

proposed "Integrated Freight Complex, Madanpur Khadar" Project,

which is an infrastructure project falling in "Commercial and

Transportation" use Zone. The DDA also stated in its affidavit that

the total area of land as required for the Integrated Freight Complex,

Madanpur Khadar is around 158 hectares. Of this, land

admeasuring 51.23 hectares was handed over to DDA by LAC/L&B

Department. Out of the land handed over to DDA, 31.68 hectares

has been transferred to the Integrated Freight Complex, Madanpur

Khadar. The rest of the land is earmarked for other purposes. Land

admeasuring 32.72 hectares has been acquired but physical

possession has not been handed over as it was heavily built-up. The

remaining land belongs to the U.P. Government.

6. The affidavit goes on to further state that the DDA has been

regularly following up the matter with the U.P. Government for the

land which is required for the Integrated Freight Complex at

Madanpur Khadar. As per the DDA, the Integrated Freight Complex

is planned to be constructed. However, the project would be

implementable upon the land in possession of the U.P. Government

becoming available.

7. In view of the fact of what has been stated hereinabove and the

affidavit filed by the DDA, it is evident that DDA intends to set up the

Integrated Freight Complex and is taking necessary action for the

said purpose. In view of the same, nothing further survives in the

present petition and the same is disposed of accordingly. All the

pending applications also stand disposed of.

CHIEF JUSTICE

NEERAJ KISHAN KAUL, J APRIL 29, 2009 sb

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter