Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 1552 Del
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2008
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI
Date of order: September 04, 2008
R.F.A. No.446 of 1988
% Shri Hoshiar Singh & Others ... Appellants
Through: None
versus
Union of India ... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to Reporter or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported
in the Digest?
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral)
1. Though none appears for the appellants, in view of the
decision rendered by a coordinate Division Bench of this Court
reported as 99 (2002) DLT 564, Dula Ram vs. UOI, we dispose of
the appeal modifying the impugned judgment and decree
passed by the learned Additional District Judge by enhancing the
compensation payable to the appellant for their land @
Rs.20,000/- per bigha.
2. We note that the decision in Dula Ram's case related to
lands which were acquired pursuant to a notification dated
23.1.1965 issued under Section 4 of the L.A. Act 1894 in Village
Lado Sarai.
3. Instant appeal also relates to lands acquired in Village
Lado Sarai pursuant to the same notification, i.e., notification
dated 23.1.1965.
4. The appellants would also be entitled to consequential
reliefs as admissible in law pertaining to the enhanced
compensation.
5. Since none appears for the appellant, there shall be no
orders as to costs.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
September 4, 2008
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!