Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 2101 Del
Judgement Date : 27 November, 2008
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
11.
+ RFA No. 835/1987
% DATE OF DECISION: 27th November, 2008
UOI ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ramesh Ray, Advocate.
versus
GIAN CHAND SHARMA ..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?
JUDGMENT
MUKUL MUDGAL, J: (ORAL)
1. This appeal challenges the impugned judgment dated 15th April, 1987
of the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi in LAC No. 79/76 in respect
of land situated in revenue estate of Village Sultanpur, Mehrauli, New Delhi
in awarding compensation @ Rs. 6,445/- per bigha.
2. It is not in dispute that this Court in similarly situated lands, though
for different notification, has awarded a sum of Rs. 6,000/- per bigha in RFA
No. 83-D of 1960 titled as Union of India Vs. Dewan Chand, decided on
23rd July, 1963, relating the land acquired through Notification dated 25 th
July, 1956 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act.
3. Considering the fact that the present acquisition is of 1961, we are of
the view that the compensation @ Rs. 6,445/- per bigha cannot be
considered to be unreasonable due to passage of time. Accordingly, while
we find no merit in the appeal in so far as quantum is concerned, learned
counsel for the appellant is absolutely right in stating that the Respondent
shall not be entitled to recover the additional amount as directed in
paragraph 12 of the said judgment under Section 23 (1A) of the Land
Acquisition Act in view of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in K.S.
Paripoornam Vs. State of Kerala AIR 1995 SC 1012 as award is dated 17th
April, 1975 that is much prior to the year of 1982 fixed in the said judgment.
Accordingly, the direction qua the additional amount in para 12 of the
impugned judgment is set aside.
4. The appeal is dismissed with the above modification. The amount
payable shall be paid not later than twelve weeks from today.
5. Since nobody is there to press cross-objections, the cross-objections
are dismissed.
MUKUL MUDGAL, J
MANMOHAN, J NOVEMBER 27, 2008 sb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!