Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 1940 Del
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2008
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: 16.10.2008
% Date of decision: 03.11.2008
+ RFA (OS) No.57 of 2008
M/S. PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE LIMITED ...APPELLANT
Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate
with Mr. Pragyan Sharma,
Ms. Kanika Mehra & Mr. Mohit,
Advocates.
Versus
M/S. LIZARD LOUNGE & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
Through: Mr. K.K. Sharma, Advocate
for Respondents 4 & 9.
Ms. Pratibha M. Singh &
Mr. Sudeep Chatterjee,
Advocates for Respondents 7, 12
& 14.
Ms. Bimla Sharma, Advocate for
Respondents 11 & 15.
Ms. Nidhi Lal, Advocate for
Respondent No.14.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOOL CHAND GARG
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers
may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to Reporter or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be
reported in the Digest?
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
1. For orders see RFA (OS) No.58/2008.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
NOVEMBER 03, 2008 MOOL CHAND GARG, J. b'nesh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!