Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. D.K. Sen & Anr. vs Mcd
2008 Latest Caselaw 1050 Del

Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 1050 Del
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2008

Delhi High Court
Dr. D.K. Sen & Anr. vs Mcd on 16 July, 2008
Author: S.N. Aggarwal
                                                        REPORTABLE

*           IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                                 Date of Decision : July 16, 2008


+                    WP(C) No.3372/1991

#     DR. D.K. SEN & ANR.              ...   Petitioners.

!                                 Mr. Vikram Nandrajog, Advocate
                         Versus

$     MCD                              ...   Respondent

^                                 Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.


CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. AGGARWAL

    1. Whether reporters of Local paper may be allowed to see the
       judgment?
    2. To be referred to the reporter or not?
    3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

S.N. Aggarwal, J. (Oral)

1 The petitioners who are two in number have filed this writ

petition seeking a writ of Mandamus against the MCD (respondent herein)

to forthwith implement the memorandum of settlement between the

Joint Action Counsel of Service Doctors and Government of India dated

21st August, 1989, the terms whereof have been adopted by the

respondent vide resolution No.1226/GW/Corp. dated 06th March, 1991

against agenda item No.1189. The petitioners have further prayed for

directions to the respondent to grant them salary in Super Time Grade-I

in the pay scale of Rs.5900-6700 together with all consequential benefits

with effect from 01st March, 1990.

Brief facts of the case in sofar as they are relevant are as

follows:

2 The petitioners who have filed the present writ petition were

working as doctors with the respondent. The petitioner No.1 is reported

to has expired during the pendency of the present writ petition and after

his death his legal heirs were not brought on record. The writ petition

qua the petitioner No.1 has therefore abated. In so far as petitioner No.2

is concerned, he was granted Super Time Scale of Rs.4500-5700 w.e.f 11 th

December, 1989. He has superannuated from the service of the

respondent while in the Super Time Scale of Rs.4500-5700 on 31st

December, 1991.

3 In terms of the settlement between the Joint Action Counsel

of Service Doctors and Government of India, the Government agreed to

grant certain benefits to its service doctors for betterment of their career

opportunities. The extended benefits were made applicable to the

service doctors of Government of India w.e.f. 01st March, 1990. Broadly

speaking the benefits that were granted to the service doctors of

Government of India in terms of settlement were as follows:-

"2. Demand relating to betterment of career opportunities for service doctors.

2.1 CHS Medical Officers in the scale of Rs.2200-4000

shall be promoted as Senior Medical Officers in the scale of Rs.3000-4500 on completion of four years of regular service on the basis of seniority-cum-fitness.

2.2 CHS senior Medical Officers in the scale of Rs.3000-4500 shall be promoted as Chief Medical Officers in the scale of Rs.3700-5000 on completion of six years of regular service in GDMO Sub Cadre as Senior Medical Officer or on completion of ten years as MO and SMO of which two years shall be as Senior Medical Officer on the basis of seniority-cum-fitness subject to availability of vacancies.

2.3 Government will create 134 additional posts in the Senior Administrative Grade of Rs.5900-6700 in addition to the existing posts in the Central Health Service, as a measure of immediate relief, pending a comprehensive cadre review of the service.

2.3.A. In regard to specialist sub-cadres, the arrangements set out in para 2.1 and 2.2 will apply pari-passu namely Non-Teaching & Public Health Sub- Cadres.

4 The petitioner was already working in the Super Time Scale of

Rs.4500-5700 when the settlement became effective w.e.f 01st March,

1990. He could get the benefit of Senior Administrative Grade of

Rs.5900-6700 only in case additional post as mentioned in para 2.3

referred above were to be created by the respondent. It is true that the

respondent has adopted the settlement made applicable by the

Government of India to its service doctors w.e.f. 01st March, 1990 vide

resolution, which is at page-31 of the paper book, but a perusal of the

said resolution would show that the benefit of Senior Administrative

Grade of Rs.5900-6700 was to be given against 12 posts in the grade of

Rs.5900-6700 to be distributed between the General and the Specialists

Cadre doctors separately. The distribution of 12 posts amongst the

General and Specialist cadre doctors in terms of above referred resolution

of the respondent was not done till the date the petitioners had retired

from the service of the respondent. It is not even the case of the

petitioners that the respondent has given the benefit of the scheme of

settlement to any other doctor junior to them.

5 Mr. Vikram Nandrajog, learned counsel appearing on behalf of

the petitioners has very fairly conceded that the scheme in question was

not implemented by the respondent till the retirement of petitioner No.2

or for that matter even the retirement of petitioner No.1 who died during

the pendency of the present writ petition. The scheme was admittedly

implemented by the respondent later on in 1995 and therefore the

petitioners cannot take advantage of the said scheme.

6 Furthermore, the petitioners, in this writ petition, have prayed

for directions to the respondent that the respondent should immediately

implement the scheme as extended by the Government of India to its

service doctors w.e.f. 01st March, 1990. As far as this prayer of the

petitioners is concerned, the said prayer has been complied with by the

respondent itself in 1995 during the pendency of the present writ petition

and the same has rendered the prayer made in the present writ petition

infructuous.

7 In view of the above, I do not find any merit in this writ

petition, which fails and is hereby dismissed but in the circumstances with

no order as to costs.

July 16, 2008                                   S.N.AGGARWAL
'nks'                                              [JUDGE]





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter