Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 2147 Del
Judgement Date : 3 December, 2008
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Judgment delivered on : 03.12.2008
+ ITA 17/2008
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-II
....APPELLANT
- versus -
METZELER AUTOMOTIVE PROFILES INDIA LTD
..... RESPONDENT
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Appellant : Mr. R D Jolly with Mr Paras Chaudhry For the Respondent : Mr P N Monga CORAM :-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to Reporters or not ?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL)
1. This appeal is directed against the Tribunal's order dated 29.9.2006
pertaining to the assessment year 1996-97. The issue sought to be raised
is whether the royalty amount paid in lieu of technical know-how given to
the foreign collaborator amounts to revenue or capital expenditure. The
Tribunal held the same to be of a revenue nature. The Tribunal applied
the ratio of the Supreme Court decision in CIT vs Ciba India Ltd: 69 ITR
692. The Tribunal also noted that with reference to the same agreement
the department had allowed the expenditure in the preceding and
subsequent years and, therefore, following the principle of consistency
also, the same treatment ought to be given in the current year. We see no
infirmity in the order passed by the Tribunal. No substantial question of
law arises for our consideration. The appeal is dismissed.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
December 03, 2008 mb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!