Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 1419 Del
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2008
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ Crl. (Bail) Appl. No. 1000/2008
% DATE OF DECISION : 21st AUGUST, 2008
OM PRAKASH SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Jayant K. Sud and Mr. Kalyan
Dutt, Advocates
versus
STATE ....Respondent
Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, APP for the
State.
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate for
the complainant.
Insp. S.K. Rao.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may No
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? No
JUDGMENT
MANMOHAN, J: (ORAL)
1. This is an anticipatory bail application filed by the father of the
girl, Mr. Om Prakash Sharma. On the last date of hearing, I had
directed the husband, Mr. Rohit Sharma, and the wife, Ms. Charu
Sharma, to appear in Court. Both the parties have expressed their
inclination to resolve the dispute amicably. In Amit Sharma's case i.e.
Bail Appl. No. 999/2008, I have referred the matter to the Delhi High
Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.
2. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present
case, I grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner in FIR No.185/2008
registered with PS Patel Nagar under Sections 452, 323, 506 and 34
IPC. In the event of arrest of the Petitioner, he shall be released on
bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/-
with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the
Investigating Officer.
3. The application is allowed in above terms.
August 21, 2008 MANMOHAN, J. rb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!