Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 1404 Del
Judgement Date : 20 August, 2008
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ Crl. M.C. 70/2007
% DATE OF DECISION : 20th AUGUST, 2008
NITIN GUPTA ..... Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
STATE & ORS ....Respondents
Through: Mr. R.N. Vats, APP for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may No
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? No
JUDGMENT
MANMOHAN, J: (ORAL)
1. Despite a pass-over, none is present on behalf of the petitioner.
2. However, I have perused the file and I find that the petitioner
has already been granted regular bail by learned Additional Sessions
Judge vide its order dated 22nd November, 2006. Consequently, the
prayer made by the petitioner for quashing of order dated 17th
November, 2006 passed MM, rejecting petitioner's bail, does not
survive.
3. Accordingly the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
August 20, 2008 MANMOHAN, J. rb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!