Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 1359 Del
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2008
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ Crl.M.C No.2427/2008
% Date of Decision: 14.08.2008
Sh.Satpal Manchanda .... Petitioner
Through Ms.Charu Anand, Advocate.
Versus
The State (NCT of Delhi) .... Respondent
Through Mr.R.N. Vats, APP for the State.
Mr.J.S.Lamba, Advocate for the
respondent No.2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be YES
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in NO
the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No.406/1999 under
Sections 39/44 of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and Section 379 of
Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the respondent No.2, Mr.J.S.Lamba on
instructions states that the amount demanded from the petitioner has
since been paid and consequently, it is contended that no useful
purpose shall be served in continuing the proceedings pursuant to the
said FIR. It is also stated that it shall be in the interest of justice if the
said FIR in the present facts and circumstances is quashed. Mr.Vats,
learned counsel for the State also has no objection to quashing of FIR
against the petitioner.
Consequently, in the totality of facts and circumstances, FIR
No.406/1999 under Sections 39/44 of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and
Section 379 of Indian Penal Code and all the proceedings emanating
therefrom against the petitioner are quashed.
The petition is disposed of.
Dasti.
August 14, 2008 ANIL KUMAR, J. 'k'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!