Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 1356 Del
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2008
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C.No.2648/2008
% Date of decision : 14.08.2008
Gopal Chopra & Ors ....... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Bhupinder Mehtani, Advocate.
Versus
State & Another ......... Respondents
Through : Mr. R.N. Vats, APP for State.
Ms.Chhaya Chopra, respondent
No.2 in person.
SI Bhagat Singh, P.S.Kirti Nagar.
CORAM :-
* HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may YES
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported NO
in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
The petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2, husband and wife are
present with their counsel. Learned counsel contends that the disputes
between the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2, husband and wife
has since been resolved and they have started living together since 29th
July, 2008. It is contended that continuation of proceedings pursuant
to FIR No.528/2005 under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC registered at
Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi may not be conducive for the future
matrimonial peace between the parties. In the circumstances, it is
contended that no useful purpose shall be served in continuing the
proceedings pursuant to the said FIR.
Let the statement of respondent No.2 be recorded.
Statement of respondent No.2 has been recorded who is identified
by the counsel for the petitioner. Considering the facts and
circumstances and the statement of respondent No.2 it is apparent that
no useful purpose shall be served in continuing the proceedings
pursuant to FIR No.528/2005 under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC
registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi as the respondent No.2
wife has started living with the petitioner as husband and wife.
Continuation of the proceedings will also not be conducive for the
future matrimonial peace and living together of the petitioner No.1 and
respondent No.2.
Considering the facts and circumstances, it shall also be in the
interest of justice to quash the FIR No.528/2005 under Sections
498A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi and
all the proceeding emanating therefrom. Learned Additional Public
Prosecutor, Mr.Vats, has also no objection to the quashing of the FIR
and all the proceedings emanating therefrom in the present facts and
circumstances of the case.
Therefore, in the totality of facts and circumstances, FIR
No.528/2005 under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police
Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi, and all the proceedings emanating therefrom
against the petitioners are quashed.
The petition is disposed of.
Dasti.
August 14, 2008 ANIL KUMAR, J. 'k'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!