Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 1238 Del
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2008
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C.No.2163/2008
% Date of decision : 05.08.2008
Sh.Virender Kumar Sharma & Others ....... Petitioners
Through: Mr.I.S. Sharma, Advocate along
with petitioner No.1 in person.
Versus
The State & Another ......... Respondents
Through : Mr. R.N. Vats, APP for State.
Mr.Saurabh Singh, Advocate for
respondent No.2 along with
respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM :-
* HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may YES
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported NO
in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 are present with their
counsel. Learned counsel for the parties state that the matter between
the parties has been resolved amicably and the marriage between the
petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 has been dissolved by a decree of
divorce by mutual consent under Section 13 B (2) of Hindu Marriage
Act, 1955 dated 18th July, 2008.
Under the settlement, respondent No.2 is entitled for a total sum
of Rs.2.50 lakh out of which Rs.1.25 lakh was paid earlier and
Rs.1.25 lakh has been paid to her today in the court by a demand draft
bearing No.160232 dated 04.04.2008 for a sum of Rs.1.25 lakh drawn
on Punjab National Bank, CDFC, Delhi Finance.
Learned counsel for the parties state that in view of the
settlement no useful purpose shall be served in continuing with the
proceedings pursuant to FIR No.404/1999 under Sections 406/498A of
Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Adarsh Nager, against
petitioners.
Let the statement of respondent No.2 be recorded, who is
identified by her counsel.
Statement of respondent No.2 has been recorded. The disputes
between the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2, who were husband
and wife, has been resolved amicably. The marriage between the
petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 has already been dissolved by a
decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13 B (2) of Hindu
Marriage Act, 1955 dated 18th July, 2008. It is apparent that no useful
purpose shall be served in continuing with the proceedings pursuant to
FIR No.404/1999 under Sections 406/498A of Indian Penal Code
registered at Police Station Adarsh Nager, against petitioners.
Considering the facts and circumstances, it shall also be in the
interest of justice to quash the said FIR and all the proceeding
emanating therefrom. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr.Vats,
has also no objection to the quashing of the FIR.
Therefore, in the totality of facts and circumstances, FIR
No.404/1999 under Sections 406/498A of Indian Penal Code registered
at Police Station Adarsh Nager, and all the proceedings emanating
therefrom against petitioners are quashed.
The petition is disposed of.
Dasti.
August 05, 2008 ANIL KUMAR, J. 'Dev'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!