Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Cit vs Sant Bir Bros
2001 Latest Caselaw 1642 Del

Citation : 2001 Latest Caselaw 1642 Del
Judgement Date : 9 October, 2001

Delhi High Court
Cit vs Sant Bir Bros on 9 October, 2001
Equivalent citations: 2002 120 TAXMAN 884 Delhi

JUDGMENT

1. Following questions have been referred for opinion of this court under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the Tribunal, Delhi Bench D :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that Sarvashri Sant Bir Singh, Shiv Bir Singh and Amar Bir Singh were co-owners of the properties at 6, Jor Bagh and C-27-28, South Extension, New Delhi since 1974-75 ?

2. Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that the capital gains arising on account of sale of property at C-27-28, South Extension, New Delhi, is taxable equally amongst the three co-owners and not in the hands of the assessed-firm?"

The dispute relates to the assessment year 1976-77.

2. The Tribunal while deciding the appeal took note of the fact that on the question of grant of registration for several years the conclusions were to be dependent upon the facts and situation prevailing. For the assessment year in question, the income from sale of property was held to be income from capital gains and, therefore, was to be taxed in the hands of the co-owners separately to the extent of their one-third share each and not in the hands of the firm. The conclusions of the Tribunal are essentially factual and do not give rise to any question of law. We, accordingly, decline to answer the questions referred.

2. The Tribunal while deciding the appeal took note of the fact that on the question of grant of registration for several years the conclusions were to be dependent upon the facts and situation prevailing. For the assessment year in question, the income from sale of property was held to be income from capital gains and, therefore, was to be taxed in the hands of the co-owners separately to the extent of their one-third share each and not in the hands of the firm. The conclusions of the Tribunal are essentially factual and do not give rise to any question of law. We, accordingly, decline to answer the questions referred.

3. Reference is, accordingly, disposed of.

3. Reference is, accordingly, disposed of.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter