Citation : 2001 Latest Caselaw 895 Del
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2001
JUDGMENT
Arijit Pasayat, C.J.
At the instance of the revenue, following question has been referred for opinion of this court under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the Tribunal, Delhi Bench A :
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law to give a finding that the assessed was not covered by section 13(2)(h) of the Income Tax Act or any other provision of section 13 and thereby allowing its claim for exemption from tax of its dividend income under section 11 of the Income Tax Act ?"
Dispute relates to the assessment year 1976-77.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the revenue. There is no appearance on behalf of the assessed in spite of notice. An identical question was considered in the assessed's own cases for the assessment years 1971-72, 1972-73 and 1973-74. Following the view expressed in the connected cases, i.e., IT Reference Nos. 307, 308 of 1978 and 337 of 1980
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the revenue. There is no appearance on behalf of the assessed in spite of notice. An identical question was considered in the assessed's own cases for the assessment years 1971-72, 1972-73 and 1973-74. Following the view expressed in the connected cases, i.e., IT Reference Nos. 307, 308 of 1978 and 337 of 1980
3. The reference stands disposed of.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!