Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harish Chander & Ors. vs Shri Navneet Kumar Garg
1999 Latest Caselaw 670 Del

Citation : 1999 Latest Caselaw 670 Del
Judgement Date : 12 August, 1999

Delhi High Court
Harish Chander & Ors. vs Shri Navneet Kumar Garg on 12 August, 1999
Equivalent citations: 81 (1999) DLT 281
Author: M Sarin
Bench: M Sarin

ORDER

Manmohan Sarin, J.

1. This petition has been preferred under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940 by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents for removal of the goods kept in the showrooms belonging to the petitioners. The parties had entered into an Agreement dated 10th February, 1995. The respondent under the agreement began operating his showroom of Bombay Dyeing in the premises bearing No. 5134/4, Main Bazar, Pahar Ganj, New Delhi. As per the petitioner, the Agreement terms come to an end on 10.2.1998 and the petitioner is entitled to its possession and the respondent is liable to remove the goods. The present grievance of the petitioner was that the respondent was not removing its goods from the premises. The dispute had been referred to the arbitration of Justice Mrs. Santosh Duggal a retired judge of this court pursuant to an order dated 31.3.1998. Councel for the petitioner states that the learned Judge has terminated the proceedings under section 32 of the Act on the respondent failing to lead evidence to support the claim.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that reply need not be filed to the petition and instead he would make submissions. Counsel for the parties have been heard.

3. With the consent of the parties the following order/directions are given:-

(i) The respondent shall remove all his goods from the premises within two weeks from today and also return the key which is lying with him, to the petitioner.

(ii) The respondent would move the Learned arbitrator with a request to revive/resume the proceedings that have been terminated by her, to enable the respondent to prove his case in respect of the claims being adjudicated by her.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in the event of such an application being made before the learned arbitrator the petitioner would not oppose the same. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has instructions from respondent to accept the above terms. The parties shall be bound by the above terms. The petition stands disposed in the above terms.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter