Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anup Razdan (Dr.) vs Union Of India
1998 Latest Caselaw 539 Del

Citation : 1998 Latest Caselaw 539 Del
Judgement Date : 15 July, 1998

Delhi High Court
Anup Razdan (Dr.) vs Union Of India on 15 July, 1998
Equivalent citations: 1998 VAD Delhi 18, 74 (1998) DLT 627, 1998 (46) DRJ 336
Author: K Ramamoorthy
Bench: K Ramamoorthy

ORDER

K. Ramamoorthy, J.

1. The petitioner has prayed for quashing the nomination of respondents 3 to 6 for the MDS course against the seats reserved for Central Government nominees at King George Medical College, Lucknow for the Academic Year 1995-96. The writ petition was instituted on 10.11.1997. The case of the petitioner shortly stated is that Respondents 3 to 6 were not qualified to be nominated and they have allotted seat on extraneous consideration. The selection of the candidates made by preparing the merit list and nomination of the candidates and the allotment of specialised made in the order of merits. The petitioner is very much lower down in the list of selected candidates and therefore, she cannot claim any right to be nominated. The petitioner has no locus standi to maintain the writ petition

2. Mr. Prashant Bhushan, the learned counsel for the petitioner raised several contentions relating to the nominations of the candidates from Delhi, when there is a college at Delhi, namely, All India Medical Institute of Science and other points. In view of the fact that the petitioner is very much lower down in the list of selected candidates. Even if the case of the petitioner is accepted with reference to respondents 3 to 6, the petitioner cannot claim to be selected and nominated for the college at King George Medical College, Lucknow.

3. Respondents 3 to 6 are fully qualified and no case has been made out by the petitioner to substantiate the point that respondents 3 to 6 are not qualified and their nomination and selection made is not in accordance with law.

4. In this view of the matter, I do not deem it necessary to consider other points raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the writ petition is dismissed.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter