Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Cashmere Woollen And Silk Mills vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
1998 Latest Caselaw 27 Del

Citation : 1998 Latest Caselaw 27 Del
Judgement Date : 9 January, 1998

Delhi High Court
Cashmere Woollen And Silk Mills vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 9 January, 1998
Equivalent citations: 1999 238 ITR 1026 Delhi
Author: R Lahoti
Bench: R Lahoti, D Bhandari

JUDGMENT

R.C. Lahoti, J.

1. This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, made at the instance of the assessee arising out of the assessment year 1982-85 seeking opinion of the High Court on the following question of law :

"Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in holding that the amount of Rs. 2,72,036 on account of import entitlements received by the assessee was assessable to income-tax as business income ?"

2. The plea raised on behalf of the assessee was that the transfer of import entitlements amounted to transfer of source of income and, therefore, should not be treated as revenue receipt. This plea did not find favour with the Tribunal and the premium earned by the assessee has been held liable to tax.

3. However, as pointed out by learned senior standing counsel for the Department, this reference has been rendered academic merely in view of the change in law made effective retrospectively. The Finance Act, 1990, has introduced Clause (iiia) in Section 28 of the Act according to which, proceeds of sale of licence granted under the Imports (Control) Order, 1955, made under the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, is income chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession". An amendment has also been effected in the definition of income in clause (24) of Section 2 of the interpretation clause of the Act whereby any sum chargeable under Clause (iiia) of Section 28 is included in the definition of "income". These amendments, though inserted by the Finance Act of 1990, have been given a retrospective effect from April 1, 1962. The assessment year 1974-75 (sic) is clearly covered by the amendment. Thus, whatever might have been the controversy earlier, the same does not survive for decision in view of the amendments referred to hereinabove, according to which the premium earned by the assessee is liable to be taxed as "income" under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession".

4. For the foregoing reasons, the reference is held to have been rendered academic merely and hence is returned unanswered.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter