Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nawal Kishore And Ors. vs Union Of India And Ors.
1995 Latest Caselaw 537 Del

Citation : 1995 Latest Caselaw 537 Del
Judgement Date : 18 July, 1995

Delhi High Court
Nawal Kishore And Ors. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 18 July, 1995
Equivalent citations: AIR 1996 Delhi 114, 1995 (34) DRJ 421
Author: M.K.Sharma
Bench: D Wadhwa, M Sharma

JUDGMENT

M.K.Sharma, J.

(1) This is an appeal filed by the claimant/appellant under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the determination of compensation payable to the claimant/appellant under the award No.1422 in L.A.C case No.515/68 passed by the Additional District Judge, Delhi dated 24.10.1986.

(2) By the aforesaid notification under Section 4 of the Act a total land measuring 20 bighas and 2 biswas in all was acquired wherein the appellant/claimant had 1/3rd share. The declaration under Section 6 of the Act was made on 12.9.1962. The Land Acquisition Officer divided the land into 2 blocks and awarded the market value of Rs.2,000.00 and Rs.1,500.00 per bigha for the land placed in the said two blocks.. The disputed land was categoriesed in block 'A' and the Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value of the disputed land at Rs.2,000.00 per bigha.

(3) On reference the Additional District Judge, Delhi through the impugned award enhanced the compensation amount and determined the same at Rs.7,250.00 per bigha. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid determination of compensation in respect of the disputed land the present appeal has been preferred in this court claiming a higher compensation.

(4) Our attention has been drawn to a decision of this court in R.F.A.No-113/1980 in the case of Pt. Sis Ram (deceased through L.R.S) and another Vs. Union of India, decided on 27.10.1994, where in this court, relying on the decision of this court in R.F.A.463/1979,Chhajju Vs. Union of India decided on 3.12.1979, determined compensation of land in respect of land situated in Village Bahapur and acquired under notification dated 13.11.1959 under Section 4 of the Act at Rs.l9,000.00 per bigha as fair and reasonable market value. In Chhajju's case (supra) the Land Acquisition Collector divided the land into 4 blocks namely - blocks 1,2,3 & 4 and assessed the land acquisition compensation at Rs.6,000.00 , , Rs.3,500.00 and Rs.2,500.00 per bigha respectively. However, in the appeal filed before this court by Chhajju this court determied the land acquisition compensation at Rs.l9,000.00 and Rs.l6,000.00 per bigha respectively for his land categorised by the Land Acquisition Collector under blocks 1 & 2 respectively. Accordingly, the land which was assessed at Rs.6,000.00 and Rs.4,500.00 by the Land Acquisition Collector came to be determined and assessed at Rs.l9,000.00 and Rs.l6,000.00 per bigha respectively by this court in Chhajju's case (supra).

(5) As and when we take into consideration the ratio of the aforesaid decision in Chhajju's case it became apparent to us that for the land which was assessed at Rs.2,500.00 per bigha by the Land Acquisition Collector the just and fair compensation for such type of land on the basis of the ratio of Chhajju's case (supra) could be determined at Rs.l2,000.00 when the difference and criteria followed in Chhajju's case is take note of. In the present appeal, however, we are concerned with the land at Village Bahapur, acquired by notification under Section 4 of the Act of the same date for which land the Land Acquisition Collector assessed and determined the market value of the land at Rs.2,000.00 which subsequently came to be enhanced and determined by the learned Additional District Judge at Rs.5,250.00 . On the evidence on record of the present case we are satisfied that the judgment and order given by this court in Chhajju's case (supra) in respect of the same village Bahapur and acquired by a notification under Section 4 of the Act of the same date could be accepted as a relevant and reliable material to afford a basis for determining the compensation for the land involved in the present acquisition proceedings.

(6) On analysing the evidence adduced in the present case and following the ratio of the decision in Chhajju's case (supra) we hold that the market value of the land acquired in the present case should be Rs.12,000.00 per bigha. Accordingly, we fix the market value of the land in question at Rs.12,000.00 per bigha.

(7) In the result, the appeal filed by the appellant/claimant is allowed to the extent indicated above. We further order that the present appellant/claimant is entitled to l/3rd share in the 55% compensation falling to the share of the land owners in the case. Over and above, the appellant/claimant shall be entitled to solarium at 30% and interest under Section 28 of the Act in accordance with the provisions of law on the enhanced compensation. The claimant/appellant however, shall not be entitled to any interest under Section 28 of the Act from 5.9.1972 to 17.5.1982 as agreed to by him before the learned Additional District. Judge. The appellant/claimant shall also be entitled to the costs limited to the court fee.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter