Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd. And ... vs Assistant Director, Enforcement ...
1991 Latest Caselaw 230 Del

Citation : 1991 Latest Caselaw 230 Del
Judgement Date : 14 March, 1991

Delhi High Court
Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd. And ... vs Assistant Director, Enforcement ... on 14 March, 1991
Equivalent citations: 44 (1991) DLT 209
Author: M Jain
Bench: M Jain, A Kumar

JUDGMENT

M.C. Jain, C.J.

(1) Rule D.B.

(2) This petition is directed against the Opportunity Notices, Annexures 'T', 'U', 'V', 'W' dated 28th November, 1990, and a threatened action on the part of the respondents to launch prosecution proceedings against the petitioner under Section 61 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The apprehension of the petitioner is that in the adjudication proceedings, it has been found by respondent no. 1 that there was no permission available with the petitioner and against the adjudication order, the petitioners have preferred an appeal before the F.E.R.A. Board. Having recorded the findings in the adjudication proceedings. Opportunity Notices in terms of proviso to Section 61(2) have been given to the petitioner. According to the petitioner, serving of Opportunity Notices is only an empty formality and prosecution is imminent under Section 61(2)(ii) and complaint in writing is likely to be made by the Directorate of Enforcement, It may be stated that Opportunity Notices have not yet been disposed of and no decision has been taken on the Opportunity Notices served on the petitioner. We cannot foresee the outcome of the opportunity notices. It may be that the stage of cognizance of offence may not arise. Even if it arises, it would be proper that the petitioner's interest may be safeguarded by granting time to the petitioner to avail appropriate opportunity before making of any complaint in writing by the Directorate of Enforcement. The petitioner's interest in such a manner can be safeguarded before any prosecution is launched against the petitioner.

(3) Accordingly, we direct that no complaint in writing would be made against the petitioner by the Directorate of Enforcement for a period of two months in case the result of the Opportunity Notices is that the petitioner is to be prosecuted. We also hope that the F.E.R.A. Board will decide the appeal within a period of two months so that the view of the F.E.R A. Board may also be known to the prosecuting authorities. This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter