Citation : 1989 Latest Caselaw 187 Del
Judgement Date : 20 March, 1989
JUDGMENT
B.N. Kirpal, J.
1. This petition under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, pertains to the assessment year 1981-82 and the Commissioner seeks reference of two questions of law to this court.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has brought to our notice the order of the Tribunal under section 256(1) in respect of the assessment year 1980-81, where the Tribunal itself has referred two identical questions of law to this court for its decision. In view thereof, we direct the Tribunal to state the case and refer the following two questions of law to this court :
"1. Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correction law in holding that interest paid on loans borrowed by the assessed is not to be apportioned between income from business and income from dividends and that thus is fully adjustable against business income only ?
2. Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that, for the purpose of deduction under section 80M, it was the gross dividend income that should be considered, especially in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Distribution (Baroda) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India [1985] 155 ITR 120 ?"
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!