Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3116 Chatt
Judgement Date : 18 June, 2025
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA No. 280 of 2018
SMT. VIMLA DEVI versus URMILA Order Sheet
18/06/2025 Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. T.N. Nande, PL for the State. Counsel for the appellant would submit that an
agreement is not in dispute whereas the defendant in his
examination-in-chief as well as in the written statement
have taken specific stand that the agreement was executed
at Rs. 7,00,000/- out of which he has taken Rs. 50,000/-
only. He has also denied existence of execution of
agreement for sale consideration of Rs. 2,00,000/-.
This court has put specific query to the counsel for
the appellant whether specific performance of contract can
be ordered by the trial Court and this factual matrix has not
been denied by the plaintiff as to how the judgment and
decree passed by the trial Court is liable to be interfered
with or not.
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SANTOSH KUMAR KUMAR SHARMA SHARMA Date:
2025.06.19 10:29:10 +0530
At the request of counsel for the appellant, list this
case on 24.06.2025 in the fresh matter list.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) santosh Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!